DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Austin Ekeler vs Ezekiel ElliottWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Austin Ekeler is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 9.0 PPG to Ezekiel Elliott's 7.2 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Austin Ekeler is the better fantasy play this season.

Austin Ekeler has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 1.8-PPG advantage is real (9.0 to 7.2), and Austin Ekeler's 5 touchdowns show scoring upside. Ezekiel Elliott is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Austin Ekeler and Ezekiel Elliott in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
RBWashington Commanders#99PPG LEADER
Austin Ekeler
PPG
9.0
Games
14
Rush Yds
425
Rush TDs
3
Rec
45
Rec Yds
360
Bye
Week 14
RBDallas Cowboys#99
Ezekiel Elliott
PPG
7.2
Games
14
Rush Yds
452
Rush TDs
3
Rec
18
Rec Yds
128
Bye
Week 7

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Austin Ekeler
Ezekiel Elliott

Head to Head

9.0 PPG7.2 PPG
14 GP14 GP
Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Austin Ekeler: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Ezekiel Elliott: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Austin Ekeler is producing at 41% of elite pace and Ezekiel Elliott at 33%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Austin Ekeler vs Ezekiel Elliott: The Full Breakdown

Austin Ekeler and Ezekiel Elliott are both viable fantasy running backs heading into 2026, but their 2025 production tells two different stories. Austin Ekeler averaged 9.0 PPG across 14 games with the Washington Commanders, while Ezekiel Elliott posted 7.2 PPG in 14 appearances for the Dallas Cowboys.

A 1.8-PPG gap gives Austin Ekeler the edge on paper, but paper does not account for Thursday night matchups, weather games, or a star defender returning from injury. The real question is not who was better in 2025, but who is the better start this specific week.

Austin Ekeler is the receiving back in this matchup, turning 45 targets into 360 yards, while Ezekiel Elliott profiles as a more traditional rusher with 452 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns. In PPR and half-PPR formats Austin Ekeler carries the higher weekly floor. In standard leagues the gap tightens considerably.

Austin Ekeler has his bye in Week 14, and Ezekiel Elliott rests in Week 7. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at running back for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Austin Ekeler (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open. Ezekiel Elliott (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

  • Austin Ekeler outscored Ezekiel Elliott by a projected 31 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Austin Ekeler scored 5 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.4 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
  • Austin Ekeler caught 45 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Austin Ekeler vs Ezekiel Elliott: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatAustin EkelerEzekiel Elliott
PPG (Half-PPR)9.07.2
Games Played1414
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)126101
Rushing Yards425452
Rush Yds/Game30.432.3
Rushing TDs33
Receptions4518
Receiving Yards360128
Targets00
Total TDs53
Bye WeekWeek 14Week 7

Summary

Austin Ekeler outscored Ezekiel Elliott by 1.8 PPG in 2025 (9.0 to 7.2). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Austin Ekeler vs Ezekiel Elliott

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Austin Ekeler vs Ezekiel Elliott

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Austin Ekeler or Ezekiel Elliott in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Austin Ekeler has the edge at 9.0 PPG compared to Ezekiel Elliott's 7.2 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Austin Ekeler and Ezekiel Elliott average in 2025?

Austin Ekeler averaged 9.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 14 games in 2025. Ezekiel Elliott averaged 7.2 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 1.8 points per game.

When are Austin Ekeler and Ezekiel Elliott's bye weeks in 2026?

Austin Ekeler (WAS) has a bye in Week 14, and Ezekiel Elliott (DAL) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Austin Ekeler or Ezekiel Elliott a better fantasy running back in 2026?

Austin Ekeler outscored Ezekiel Elliott by 1.8 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.