Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Brandon Aiyuk vs Mike EvansWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Brandon Aiyuk is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 11.8 PPG to Mike Evans's 8.7 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Brandon Aiyuk is the better fantasy play this season.

Brandon Aiyuk has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 3.1-PPG advantage is real (11.8 to 8.7), and Brandon Aiyuk's 5 touchdowns show scoring upside. Mike Evans is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Brandon Aiyuk and Mike Evans in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRSan Francisco 49ers#99PPG LEADER

Brandon Aiyuk

PPG

11.8

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

762

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 9

WRTampa Bay Buccaneers#40

Mike Evans

PPG

8.7

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

368

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 10

The Edge Chart

Brandon Aiyuk

Mike Evans

Head to Head

11.8 PPG8.7 PPG

13 GP8 GP

Bye: Week 9Bye: Week 10

Fantasy Tiers

Brandon Aiyuk: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #99 at the position). Mike Evans: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #40 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, Brandon Aiyuk is producing at 54% of elite pace and Mike Evans at 40%. That ranking gap means Mike Evans carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Brandon Aiyuk vs Mike Evans: The Full Breakdown

Brandon Aiyuk and Mike Evans are both viable fantasy wide receivers heading into 2026, but their 2025 production tells two different stories. Brandon Aiyuk averaged 11.8 PPG across 13 games with the San Francisco 49ers, while Mike Evans posted 8.7 PPG in 8 appearances for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

A 3.1-PPG gap gives Brandon Aiyuk the edge on paper, but paper does not account for Thursday night matchups, weather games, or a star defender returning from injury. The real question is not who was better in 2025, but who is the better start this specific week.

Both are workload receivers with similar target shares. Brandon Aiyuk turned 82 targets into 762 yards and 5 touchdowns, while Mike Evans converted 62 looks into 368 yards and 3 scores. When target volume is this close, game script and defensive matchup typically decide the weekly winner.

One scheduling note: Brandon Aiyuk is off Week 9 and Mike Evans Week 10. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in wide receiver for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

If you can acquire Brandon Aiyuk at a discount because your league-mates undervalue wide receiver production, do it. Mike Evans is a reasonable sell-high candidate if his recent games have spiked above his season average. Dynasty outlook: Brandon Aiyuk (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Mike Evans (age 32) is in the later years of production. Still a redraft asset, but dynasty value is declining.

Did You Know?

•Brandon Aiyuk outscored Mike Evans by a projected 53 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Brandon Aiyuk played 13 games in 2025 compared to Mike Evans's 8. That durability gap means Brandon Aiyuk contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Brandon Aiyuk scored 5 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.4 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•Brandon Aiyuk saw 82 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Brandon Aiyuk vs Mike Evans: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Brandon Aiyuk	Mike Evans
PPG (Half-PPR)	11.8	8.7
Games Played	13	8
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	153	70
Receptions	58	30
Rec/Game	4.5	3.8
Receiving Yards	762	368
Rec Yds/Game	58.6	46.0
Receiving TDs	5	3
Targets	82	62
Target Share/Game	6.3	7.8
Age	-	32
Experience	-	11 yrs
Bye Week	Week 9	Week 10

Summary

Brandon Aiyuk outscored Mike Evans by 3.1 PPG in 2025 (11.8 to 8.7). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Brandon Aiyuk vs Mike Evans

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Brandon Aiyuk vs Mike Evans

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Brandon Aiyuk or Mike Evans in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Brandon Aiyuk has the edge at 11.8 PPG compared to Mike Evans's 8.7 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Brandon Aiyuk and Mike Evans average in 2025?▾

Brandon Aiyuk averaged 11.8 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Mike Evans averaged 8.7 PPG over 8 games. That is a difference of 3.1 points per game.

When are Brandon Aiyuk and Mike Evans's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Brandon Aiyuk (SF) has a bye in Week 9, and Mike Evans (TB) has a bye in Week 10. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Brandon Aiyuk or Mike Evans a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

Brandon Aiyuk outscored Mike Evans by 3.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.