DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Brock Bowers vs Tyler ConklinWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Brock Bowers is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 12.0 PPG to Tyler Conklin's 7.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Brock Bowers is the better fantasy play this season.

Brock Bowers is the better play on a neutral week. 12.0 PPG with 682 yards gives a reliable baseline. Tyler Conklin at 7.5 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Brock Bowers higher, but do not fade Tyler Conklin entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Brock Bowers and Tyler Conklin in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TELas Vegas Raiders#4PPG LEADER
Brock Bowers
PPG
12.0
Games
12
Rec
64
Rec Yds
680
Rec TDs
7
Targets
86
Bye
Week 13
TENew York Jets#99
Tyler Conklin
PPG
7.5
Games
17
Rec
50
Rec Yds
525
Rec TDs
3
Targets
65
Bye
Week 12

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Brock Bowers
Tyler Conklin

Head to Head

12.0 PPG7.5 PPG
12 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 13Bye: Week 12

Fantasy Tiers

Brock Bowers: Tier 1 (Elite) TE (ranked #4 at the position). Tyler Conklin: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Brock Bowers is producing at 55% of elite pace and Tyler Conklin at 34%. That ranking gap means Brock Bowers carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Brock Bowers vs Tyler Conklin: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Brock Bowers and Tyler Conklin is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The Las Vegas Raiders tight end put up 12.0 PPG in 2025 over 12 games; Tyler Conklin of the New York Jets averaged 7.5 in 17. A 4.5-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 4.5 points favors Brock Bowers, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one tight end to the other.

Both see steady target volume for the tight end position. Brock Bowers had 64 catches for 680 yards; Tyler Conklin posted 50 for 525. At a position where most starters barely clear 7 PPG, this class of tight end is where the fantasy advantage lives week to week.

Brock Bowers has his bye in Week 13, and Tyler Conklin rests in Week 12. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at tight end for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Brock Bowers is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Tyler Conklin is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Brock Bowers (age 23) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Tyler Conklin (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

  • Brock Bowers outscored Tyler Conklin by a projected 77 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Tyler Conklin played 17 games in 2025 compared to Brock Bowers's 12. That durability gap means Tyler Conklin contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Brock Bowers scored 7 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.6 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
  • Brock Bowers saw 86 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Brock Bowers vs Tyler Conklin: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatBrock BowersTyler Conklin
PPG (Half-PPR)12.07.5
Games Played1217
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)144128
Receptions6450
Rec/Game5.32.9
Receiving Yards680525
Rec Yds/Game56.730.9
Receiving TDs73
Targets8665
Target Share/Game7.23.8
Age23-
Experience1 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 13Week 12

Summary

12.0 PPG for Brock Bowers versus 7.5 for Tyler Conklin in 2025. The baseline favors Brock Bowers, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Brock Bowers vs Tyler Conklin

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Brock Bowers vs Tyler Conklin

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Brock Bowers or Tyler Conklin in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Brock Bowers has the edge at 12.0 PPG compared to Tyler Conklin's 7.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Brock Bowers and Tyler Conklin average in 2025?

Brock Bowers averaged 12.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 12 games in 2025. Tyler Conklin averaged 7.5 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 4.5 points per game.

When are Brock Bowers and Tyler Conklin's bye weeks in 2026?

Brock Bowers (LV) has a bye in Week 13, and Tyler Conklin (NYJ) has a bye in Week 12. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Brock Bowers or Tyler Conklin a better fantasy tight end in 2026?

Brock Bowers outscored Tyler Conklin by 4.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.