Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Cade Otton vs Juwan JohnsonWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Juwan Johnson is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 8.3 PPG to Cade Otton's 6.2 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Juwan Johnson is the better fantasy play this season.

Juwan Johnson is the better play on a neutral week. 8.3 PPG with 889 yards gives a reliable baseline. Cade Otton at 6.2 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Juwan Johnson higher, but do not fade Cade Otton entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Cade Otton and Juwan Johnson in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

TETampa Bay Buccaneers#29

Cade Otton

PPG

6.2

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

572

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 10

TENew Orleans Saints#17PPG LEADER

Juwan Johnson

PPG

8.3

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

889

Rec TDs

Targets

102

Bye

Week 8

The Edge Chart

Cade Otton

Juwan Johnson

Head to Head

6.2 PPG8.3 PPG

15 GP17 GP

Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Cade Otton: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) TE (ranked #29 at the position). Juwan Johnson: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) TE (ranked #17 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Cade Otton is producing at 28% of elite pace and Juwan Johnson at 38%. That ranking gap means Juwan Johnson carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Cade Otton vs Juwan Johnson: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Cade Otton and Juwan Johnson is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight end put up 6.2 PPG in 2025 over 15 games; Juwan Johnson of the New Orleans Saints averaged 8.3 in 17. A 2.1-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 2.1 points favors Juwan Johnson, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one tight end to the other.

Juwan Johnson is the volume tight end in this matchup with 77 receptions for 889 yards, while Cade Otton profiles as a more touchdown-dependent spike play (1 scores on 59 catches). In weeks where Cade Otton finds the end zone he out-scores Juwan Johnson, but the floor gap is real.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Cade Otton sits Week 10 while Juwan Johnson is off Week 8. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Cade Otton (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Juwan Johnson (age 29) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

•Juwan Johnson outscored Cade Otton by a projected 36 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Juwan Johnson played 17 games in 2025 compared to Cade Otton's 15. That durability gap means Juwan Johnson contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Juwan Johnson scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
•Juwan Johnson saw 102 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Cade Otton vs Juwan Johnson: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Cade Otton	Juwan Johnson
PPG (Half-PPR)	6.2	8.3
Games Played	15	17
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	93	141
Receptions	59	77
Rec/Game	3.9	4.5
Receiving Yards	572	889
Rec Yds/Game	38.1	52.3
Receiving TDs	1	3
Targets	81	102
Target Share/Game	5.4	6.0
Age	27	29
Experience	3 yrs	5 yrs
Bye Week	Week 10	Week 8

Summary

8.3 PPG for Juwan Johnson versus 6.2 for Cade Otton in 2025. The baseline favors Juwan Johnson, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Cade Otton vs Juwan Johnson

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Cade Otton vs Juwan Johnson

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Cade Otton or Juwan Johnson in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Juwan Johnson has the edge at 8.3 PPG compared to Cade Otton's 6.2 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Cade Otton and Juwan Johnson average in 2025?▾

Cade Otton averaged 6.2 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Juwan Johnson averaged 8.3 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 2.1 points per game.

When are Cade Otton and Juwan Johnson's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Cade Otton (TB) has a bye in Week 10, and Juwan Johnson (NO) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Cade Otton or Juwan Johnson a better fantasy tight end in 2026?▾

Juwan Johnson outscored Cade Otton by 2.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.