DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Cade Stover vs Dalton SchultzWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Dalton Schultz is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 8.0 PPG to Cade Stover's 3.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Dalton Schultz is the better fantasy play this season.

Dalton Schultz is the better play on a neutral week. 8.0 PPG with 777 yards gives a reliable baseline. Cade Stover at 3.5 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Dalton Schultz higher, but do not fade Cade Stover entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Cade Stover and Dalton Schultz in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TEHouston Texans#99
Cade Stover
PPG
3.5
Games
15
Rec
22
Rec Yds
215
Rec TDs
1
Targets
32
Bye
Week 14
TEHouston Texans#18PPG LEADER
Dalton Schultz
PPG
8.0
Games
17
Rec
82
Rec Yds
777
Rec TDs
3
Targets
106
Bye
Week 8

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Cade Stover
Dalton Schultz

Head to Head

3.5 PPG8.0 PPG
15 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Cade Stover: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Dalton Schultz: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) TE (ranked #18 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Cade Stover is producing at 16% of elite pace and Dalton Schultz at 36%. That ranking gap means Dalton Schultz carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Cade Stover vs Dalton Schultz: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Cade Stover and Dalton Schultz is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The Houston Texans tight end put up 3.5 PPG in 2025 over 15 games; Dalton Schultz of the Houston Texans averaged 8.0 in 17. A 4.5-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 4.5 points favors Dalton Schultz, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one tight end to the other.

Dalton Schultz is the volume tight end in this matchup with 82 receptions for 777 yards, while Cade Stover profiles as a more touchdown-dependent spike play (1 scores on 22 catches). In weeks where Cade Stover finds the end zone he out-scores Dalton Schultz, but the floor gap is real.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Cade Stover sits Week 14 while Dalton Schultz is off Week 8. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Dalton Schultz is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Cade Stover is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Cade Stover (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Dalton Schultz (age 29) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

  • Dalton Schultz outscored Cade Stover by a projected 77 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Dalton Schultz played 17 games in 2025 compared to Cade Stover's 15. That durability gap means Dalton Schultz contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Dalton Schultz scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
  • Dalton Schultz saw 106 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Cade Stover vs Dalton Schultz: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatCade StoverDalton Schultz
PPG (Half-PPR)3.58.0
Games Played1517
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)53136
Receptions2282
Rec/Game1.54.8
Receiving Yards215777
Rec Yds/Game14.345.7
Receiving TDs13
Targets32106
Target Share/Game2.16.2
Age-29
Experience-7 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 14Week 8

Summary

8.0 PPG for Dalton Schultz versus 3.5 for Cade Stover in 2025. The baseline favors Dalton Schultz, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Cade Stover vs Dalton Schultz

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Cade Stover vs Dalton Schultz

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Cade Stover or Dalton Schultz in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Dalton Schultz has the edge at 8.0 PPG compared to Cade Stover's 3.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Cade Stover and Dalton Schultz average in 2025?

Cade Stover averaged 3.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Dalton Schultz averaged 8.0 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 4.5 points per game.

When are Cade Stover and Dalton Schultz's bye weeks in 2026?

Cade Stover (HOU) has a bye in Week 14, and Dalton Schultz (HOU) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Cade Stover or Dalton Schultz a better fantasy tight end in 2026?

Dalton Schultz outscored Cade Stover by 4.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.