Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Cade Stover vs Luke MusgraveWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Luke Musgrave is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 4.8 PPG to Cade Stover's 3.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Luke Musgrave is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Luke Musgrave and Cade Stover are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 1.3-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Cade Stover and Luke Musgrave in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

TEHouston Texans#99

Cade Stover

PPG

3.5

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

215

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 14

TEGreen Bay Packers#99PPG LEADER

Luke Musgrave

PPG

4.8

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

335

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 10

The Edge Chart

Cade Stover

Luke Musgrave

Head to Head

3.5 PPG4.8 PPG

15 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 10

Fantasy Tiers

Cade Stover: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Luke Musgrave: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Cade Stover is producing at 16% of elite pace and Luke Musgrave at 22%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Cade Stover vs Luke Musgrave: The Full Breakdown

Cade Stover (3.5 PPG) and Luke Musgrave (4.8 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two tight ends are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. Cade Stover played 15 games for the Houston Texans; Luke Musgrave suited up 14 times for the Green Bay Packers.

A 1.3-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both see steady target volume for the tight end position. Cade Stover had 22 catches for 215 yards; Luke Musgrave posted 30 for 335. At a position where most starters barely clear 7 PPG, this class of tight end is where the fantasy advantage lives week to week.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Cade Stover sits Week 14 while Luke Musgrave is off Week 10. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Cade Stover (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Luke Musgrave (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

•Luke Musgrave outscored Cade Stover by a projected 22 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Cade Stover played 15 games in 2025 compared to Luke Musgrave's 14. That durability gap means Cade Stover contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Luke Musgrave scored 2 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.1 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
•Luke Musgrave saw 42 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Cade Stover vs Luke Musgrave: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Cade Stover	Luke Musgrave
PPG (Half-PPR)	3.5	4.8
Games Played	15	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	53	67
Receptions	22	30
Rec/Game	1.5	2.1
Receiving Yards	215	335
Rec Yds/Game	14.3	23.9
Receiving TDs	1	2
Targets	32	42
Target Share/Game	2.1	3.0
Bye Week	Week 14	Week 10

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Luke Musgrave at 4.8 PPG, 1.3 points per game above Cade Stover's 3.5. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Cade Stover vs Luke Musgrave

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Cade Stover vs Luke Musgrave

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Cade Stover or Luke Musgrave in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Luke Musgrave has the edge at 4.8 PPG compared to Cade Stover's 3.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Cade Stover and Luke Musgrave average in 2025?▾

Cade Stover averaged 3.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Luke Musgrave averaged 4.8 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 1.3 points per game.

When are Cade Stover and Luke Musgrave's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Cade Stover (HOU) has a bye in Week 14, and Luke Musgrave (GB) has a bye in Week 10. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Cade Stover or Luke Musgrave a better fantasy tight end in 2026?▾

Luke Musgrave outscored Cade Stover by 1.3 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.