Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Cade Stover vs Tyler ConklinWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Tyler Conklin is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 7.5 PPG to Cade Stover's 3.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Tyler Conklin is the better fantasy play this season.

Tyler Conklin has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 4.0-PPG advantage is real (7.5 to 3.5), and Tyler Conklin's 3 touchdowns show scoring upside. Cade Stover is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Cade Stover and Tyler Conklin in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

TEHouston Texans#99

Cade Stover

PPG

3.5

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

215

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 14

TENew York Jets#99PPG LEADER

Tyler Conklin

PPG

7.5

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

525

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 12

The Edge Chart

Cade Stover

Tyler Conklin

Head to Head

3.5 PPG7.5 PPG

15 GP17 GP

Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 12

Fantasy Tiers

Cade Stover: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Tyler Conklin: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Cade Stover is producing at 16% of elite pace and Tyler Conklin at 34%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Cade Stover vs Tyler Conklin: The Full Breakdown

Two tight ends who will land on plenty of the same rosters in 2026. Cade Stover (Houston Texans) finished the 2025 season averaging 3.5 fantasy points per game in 15 games. Tyler Conklin (New York Jets) came in at 7.5 PPG over 17 games. The gap is real but not insurmountable with the right matchup.

Tyler Conklin carries a 4.0-point PPG advantage from the 2025 season. That baseline matters, but it is one input among several. Matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and injury reports move the needle week to week, which is why the best answer changes depending on when you are asking.

Tyler Conklin is the volume tight end in this matchup with 50 receptions for 525 yards, while Cade Stover profiles as a more touchdown-dependent spike play (1 scores on 22 catches). In weeks where Cade Stover finds the end zone he out-scores Tyler Conklin, but the floor gap is real.

One scheduling note: Cade Stover is off Week 14 and Tyler Conklin Week 12. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in tight end for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

If you can acquire Tyler Conklin at a discount because your league-mates undervalue tight end production, do it. Cade Stover is a reasonable sell-high candidate if his recent games have spiked above his season average. Dynasty outlook: Cade Stover (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Tyler Conklin (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

•Tyler Conklin outscored Cade Stover by a projected 68 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Tyler Conklin played 17 games in 2025 compared to Cade Stover's 15. That durability gap means Tyler Conklin contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Tyler Conklin scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
•Tyler Conklin saw 65 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Cade Stover vs Tyler Conklin: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Cade Stover	Tyler Conklin
PPG (Half-PPR)	3.5	7.5
Games Played	15	17
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	53	128
Receptions	22	50
Rec/Game	1.5	2.9
Receiving Yards	215	525
Rec Yds/Game	14.3	30.9
Receiving TDs	1	3
Targets	32	65
Target Share/Game	2.1	3.8
Bye Week	Week 14	Week 12

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Tyler Conklin holds the PPG edge with low-end output at 7.5 points per game. Cade Stover averaged 3.5 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Cade Stover vs Tyler Conklin

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Cade Stover vs Tyler Conklin

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Cade Stover or Tyler Conklin in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Tyler Conklin has the edge at 7.5 PPG compared to Cade Stover's 3.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Cade Stover and Tyler Conklin average in 2025?▾

Cade Stover averaged 3.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Tyler Conklin averaged 7.5 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 4.0 points per game.

When are Cade Stover and Tyler Conklin's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Cade Stover (HOU) has a bye in Week 14, and Tyler Conklin (NYJ) has a bye in Week 12. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Cade Stover or Tyler Conklin a better fantasy tight end in 2026?▾

Tyler Conklin outscored Cade Stover by 4.0 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.