DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Cade Stover vs Zach ErtzWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Zach Ertz is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 7.8 PPG to Cade Stover's 3.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Zach Ertz is the better fantasy play this season.

Zach Ertz is the better play on a neutral week. 7.8 PPG with 504 yards gives a reliable baseline. Cade Stover at 3.5 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Zach Ertz higher, but do not fade Cade Stover entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Cade Stover and Zach Ertz in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TEHouston Texans#99
Cade Stover
PPG
3.5
Games
15
Rec
22
Rec Yds
215
Rec TDs
1
Targets
32
Bye
Week 14
TEWashington Commanders#20PPG LEADER
Zach Ertz
PPG
7.8
Games
13
Rec
50
Rec Yds
504
Rec TDs
4
Targets
72
Bye
Week 7

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Cade Stover
Zach Ertz

Head to Head

3.5 PPG7.8 PPG
15 GP13 GP
Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Cade Stover: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Zach Ertz: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) TE (ranked #20 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Cade Stover is producing at 16% of elite pace and Zach Ertz at 35%. That ranking gap means Zach Ertz carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Cade Stover vs Zach Ertz: The Full Breakdown

If you are choosing between Cade Stover and Zach Ertz for your lineup, you are not alone. Cade Stover finished the 2025 season at 3.5 PPG for the Houston Texans (15 games), and Zach Ertz averaged 7.8 for the Washington Commanders (13 games).

That 4.3-point weekly advantage for Zach Ertz is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Zach Ertz is the volume tight end in this matchup with 50 receptions for 504 yards, while Cade Stover profiles as a more touchdown-dependent spike play (1 scores on 22 catches). In weeks where Cade Stover finds the end zone he out-scores Zach Ertz, but the floor gap is real.

Cade Stover has his bye in Week 14, and Zach Ertz rests in Week 7. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at tight end for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Zach Ertz is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Cade Stover is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Cade Stover (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Zach Ertz (age 35) is in the later years of production. Still a redraft asset, but dynasty value is declining.

Did You Know?

  • Zach Ertz outscored Cade Stover by a projected 73 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Cade Stover played 15 games in 2025 compared to Zach Ertz's 13. That durability gap means Cade Stover contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Zach Ertz scored 4 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
  • Zach Ertz saw 72 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Cade Stover vs Zach Ertz: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatCade StoverZach Ertz
PPG (Half-PPR)3.57.8
Games Played1513
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)53101
Receptions2250
Rec/Game1.53.8
Receiving Yards215504
Rec Yds/Game14.338.8
Receiving TDs14
Targets3272
Target Share/Game2.15.5
Age-35
Experience-12 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 14Week 7

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Zach Ertz at 7.8 PPG, 4.3 points per game above Cade Stover's 3.5. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Cade Stover vs Zach Ertz

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Cade Stover vs Zach Ertz

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Cade Stover or Zach Ertz in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Zach Ertz has the edge at 7.8 PPG compared to Cade Stover's 3.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Cade Stover and Zach Ertz average in 2025?

Cade Stover averaged 3.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Zach Ertz averaged 7.8 PPG over 13 games. That is a difference of 4.3 points per game.

When are Cade Stover and Zach Ertz's bye weeks in 2026?

Cade Stover (HOU) has a bye in Week 14, and Zach Ertz (WAS) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Cade Stover or Zach Ertz a better fantasy tight end in 2026?

Zach Ertz outscored Cade Stover by 4.3 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.