DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Carson Wentz vs Mac JonesWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Carson Wentz is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 14.1 PPG to Mac Jones's 11.8 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Carson Wentz is the better fantasy play this season.

Carson Wentz has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 2.3-PPG advantage is real (14.1 to 11.8), and Carson Wentz's 6 touchdowns show scoring upside. Mac Jones is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Carson Wentz and Mac Jones in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
QBMinnesota Vikings#26PPG LEADER
Carson Wentz
PPG
14.1
Games
5
Pass Yds
1,216
Pass TDs
6
Bye
Week 6
QBSan Francisco 49ers#33
Mac Jones
PPG
11.8
Games
11
Pass Yds
2,151
Pass TDs
13
Bye
Week 8

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Carson Wentz
Mac Jones

Head to Head

14.1 PPG11.8 PPG
5 GP11 GP
Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Carson Wentz: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) QB (ranked #26 at the position). Mac Jones: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) QB (ranked #33 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Carson Wentz is producing at 64% of elite pace and Mac Jones at 54%. That ranking gap means Carson Wentz carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Carson Wentz vs Mac Jones: The Full Breakdown

Two quarterbacks who will land on plenty of the same rosters in 2026. Carson Wentz (Minnesota Vikings) finished the 2025 season averaging 14.1 fantasy points per game in 5 games. Mac Jones (San Francisco 49ers) came in at 11.8 PPG over 11 games. The gap is real but not insurmountable with the right matchup.

Carson Wentz carries a 2.3-point PPG advantage from the 2025 season. That baseline matters, but it is one input among several. Matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and injury reports move the needle week to week, which is why the best answer changes depending on when you are asking.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Carson Wentz threw for 1216 yards and 6 touchdowns, while Mac Jones posted 2151 yards and 13 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

One scheduling note: Carson Wentz is off Week 6 and Mac Jones Week 8. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in quarterback for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Carson Wentz (age 33) is on the back end of his prime. Strong now, but dynasty value declines year over year. Mac Jones (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons.

Did You Know?

  • Carson Wentz outscored Mac Jones by a projected 39 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Mac Jones played 11 games in 2025 compared to Carson Wentz's 5. That durability gap means Mac Jones contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Mac Jones scored 13 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
  • Mac Jones is 6 years younger than Carson Wentz (27 vs 33), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Carson Wentz vs Mac Jones: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatCarson WentzMac Jones
PPG (Half-PPR)14.111.8
Games Played511
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)71130
Passing Yards1,2162,151
Passing TDs613
Pass Yds/Game243.2195.5
Rushing Yards5760
Rushing TDs00
Total TDs613
TDs/Game1.21.2
Age3327
Experience9 yrs4 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 6Week 8

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Carson Wentz holds the PPG edge with solid output at 14.1 points per game. Mac Jones averaged 11.8 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Carson Wentz vs Mac Jones

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Carson Wentz vs Mac Jones

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Carson Wentz or Mac Jones in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Carson Wentz has the edge at 14.1 PPG compared to Mac Jones's 11.8 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Carson Wentz and Mac Jones average in 2025?

Carson Wentz averaged 14.1 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 5 games in 2025. Mac Jones averaged 11.8 PPG over 11 games. That is a difference of 2.3 points per game.

When are Carson Wentz and Mac Jones's bye weeks in 2026?

Carson Wentz (MIN) has a bye in Week 6, and Mac Jones (SF) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Carson Wentz or Mac Jones a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Carson Wentz outscored Mac Jones by 2.3 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.