Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Chris Olave vs Troy FranklinWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Chris Olave is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 13.6 PPG to Troy Franklin's 8.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Chris Olave is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Chris Olave outscored Troy Franklin by 5.1 PPG in 2025 with 9 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Chris Olave is the clear pick. Troy Franklin profiles as a matchup-dependent wide receiver who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Chris Olave and Troy Franklin in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRNew Orleans Saints#9PPG LEADER

Chris Olave

PPG

13.6

Games

Rec

100

Rec Yds

1,163

Rec TDs

Targets

156

Bye

Week 8

WRDenver Broncos#44

Troy Franklin

PPG

8.5

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

709

Rec TDs

Targets

104

Bye

Week 10

The Edge Chart

Chris Olave

Troy Franklin

Head to Head

13.6 PPG8.5 PPG

16 GP17 GP

Bye: Week 8Bye: Week 10

Fantasy Tiers

Chris Olave: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) WR (ranked #9 at the position). Troy Franklin: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #44 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, Chris Olave is producing at 62% of elite pace and Troy Franklin at 39%. That ranking gap means Chris Olave carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Chris Olave vs Troy Franklin: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Chris Olave and Troy Franklin is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The New Orleans Saints wide receiver put up 13.6 PPG in 2025 over 16 games; Troy Franklin of the Denver Broncos averaged 8.5 in 17. A 5.1-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 5.1 points favors Chris Olave, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one wide receiver to the other.

Target volume is the story here. Chris Olave saw 156 targets in 2025, while Troy Franklin drew 104. That workload gap usually translates into a higher weekly floor for Chris Olave, even in weeks where Troy Franklin posts the bigger ceiling game. Consistency-minded managers lean toward target share; boom-bust managers chase the upside.

One scheduling note: Chris Olave is off Week 8 and Troy Franklin Week 10. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in wide receiver for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Chris Olave is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Troy Franklin is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Chris Olave (age 25) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Troy Franklin (age 23) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•Chris Olave outscored Troy Franklin by a projected 87 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Troy Franklin played 17 games in 2025 compared to Chris Olave's 16. That durability gap means Troy Franklin contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Chris Olave scored 9 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.6 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•Chris Olave saw 156 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Chris Olave vs Troy Franklin: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Chris Olave	Troy Franklin
PPG (Half-PPR)	13.6	8.5
Games Played	16	17
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	218	145
Receptions	100	65
Rec/Game	6.3	3.8
Receiving Yards	1,163	709
Rec Yds/Game	72.7	41.7
Receiving TDs	9	6
Targets	156	104
Target Share/Game	9.8	6.1
Age	25	23
Experience	3 yrs	1 yrs
Bye Week	Week 8	Week 10

Summary

13.6 PPG for Chris Olave versus 8.5 for Troy Franklin in 2025. The baseline favors Chris Olave, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Chris Olave vs Troy Franklin

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Chris Olave vs Troy Franklin

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Chris Olave or Troy Franklin in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Chris Olave has the edge at 13.6 PPG compared to Troy Franklin's 8.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Chris Olave and Troy Franklin average in 2025?▾

Chris Olave averaged 13.6 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 16 games in 2025. Troy Franklin averaged 8.5 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 5.1 points per game.

When are Chris Olave and Troy Franklin's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Chris Olave (NO) has a bye in Week 8, and Troy Franklin (DEN) has a bye in Week 10. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Chris Olave or Troy Franklin a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

Chris Olave outscored Troy Franklin by 5.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.