Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

D'Andre Swift vs Ty ChandlerWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

D'Andre Swift is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 13.2 PPG to Ty Chandler's 5.9 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

D'Andre Swift is the better fantasy play this season.

D'Andre Swift is clearly the better fantasy option heading into 2026. With 13.2 PPG and 1,386 total yards in 2025, the production separation is too wide to overcome on matchup alone. Ty Chandler (5.9 PPG) is a hold, not a sell, but roster D'Andre Swift as the starter and Ty Chandler as depth.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track D'Andre Swift and Ty Chandler in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBChicago Bears#16PPG LEADER

D'Andre Swift

PPG

13.2

Games

Rush Yds

1,087

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

299

Bye

Week 10

RBMinnesota Vikings#99

Ty Chandler

PPG

5.9

Games

Rush Yds

265

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

135

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

D'Andre Swift

Ty Chandler

Head to Head

13.2 PPG5.9 PPG

16 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

D'Andre Swift: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) RB (ranked #16 at the position). Ty Chandler: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, D'Andre Swift is producing at 60% of elite pace and Ty Chandler at 27%. That ranking gap means D'Andre Swift carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

D'Andre Swift vs Ty Chandler: The Full Breakdown

There is a real production gap between these two running backs. D'Andre Swift (Chicago Bears) averaged 13.2 PPG over 16 games in 2025, outscoring Ty Chandler (Minnesota Vikings, 5.9 PPG) by 7.3 points per week. That separation would need a significant matchup swing to overcome.

A 7.3-PPG gap gives D'Andre Swift the edge on paper, but paper does not account for Thursday night matchups, weather games, or a star defender returning from injury. The real question is not who was better in 2025, but who is the better start this specific week.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. D'Andre Swift ran for 1087 yards and 9 touchdowns; Ty Chandler posted 265 and 2. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

One scheduling note: D'Andre Swift is off Week 10 and Ty Chandler Week 6. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in running back for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

If you can acquire D'Andre Swift at a discount because your league-mates undervalue running back production, do it. Ty Chandler is a reasonable sell-high candidate if his recent games have spiked above his season average. Dynasty outlook: D'Andre Swift (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open. Ty Chandler (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•D'Andre Swift outscored Ty Chandler by a projected 124 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•D'Andre Swift played 16 games in 2025 compared to Ty Chandler's 14. That durability gap means D'Andre Swift contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•D'Andre Swift scored 10 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.6 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•D'Andre Swift caught 34 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

D'Andre Swift vs Ty Chandler: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	D'Andre Swift	Ty Chandler
PPG (Half-PPR)	13.2	5.9
Games Played	16	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	211	83
Rushing Yards	1,087	265
Rush Yds/Game	67.9	18.9
Rushing TDs	9	2
Receptions	34	18
Receiving Yards	299	135
Targets	48	0
Total TDs	10	3
Age	27	-
Experience	5 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 10	Week 6

Summary

D'Andre Swift outscored Ty Chandler by 7.3 PPG in 2025 (13.2 to 5.9). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on D'Andre Swift vs Ty Chandler

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on D'Andre Swift vs Ty Chandler

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start D'Andre Swift or Ty Chandler in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, D'Andre Swift has the edge at 13.2 PPG compared to Ty Chandler's 5.9 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did D'Andre Swift and Ty Chandler average in 2025?▾

D'Andre Swift averaged 13.2 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 16 games in 2025. Ty Chandler averaged 5.9 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 7.3 points per game.

When are D'Andre Swift and Ty Chandler's bye weeks in 2026?▾

D'Andre Swift (CHI) has a bye in Week 10, and Ty Chandler (MIN) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is D'Andre Swift or Ty Chandler a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

D'Andre Swift outscored Ty Chandler by 7.3 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.