Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Darnell Mooney vs Jordan AddisonWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Jordan Addison is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 8.1 PPG to Darnell Mooney's 7.5 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Jordan Addison is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Jordan Addison and Darnell Mooney are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 0.6-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Darnell Mooney and Jordan Addison in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRAtlanta Falcons#99

Darnell Mooney

PPG

7.5

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

612

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 12

WRMinnesota Vikings#49PPG LEADER

Jordan Addison

PPG

8.1

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

610

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

Darnell Mooney

Jordan Addison

Head to Head

7.5 PPG8.1 PPG

15 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 12Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Darnell Mooney: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #99 at the position). Jordan Addison: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #49 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, Darnell Mooney is producing at 34% of elite pace and Jordan Addison at 37%. That ranking gap means Jordan Addison carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Darnell Mooney vs Jordan Addison: The Full Breakdown

Darnell Mooney (7.5 PPG) and Jordan Addison (8.1 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two wide receivers are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. Darnell Mooney played 15 games for the Atlanta Falcons; Jordan Addison suited up 14 times for the Minnesota Vikings.

A 0.6-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both are workload receivers with similar target shares. Darnell Mooney turned 78 targets into 612 yards and 3 touchdowns, while Jordan Addison converted 79 looks into 610 yards and 3 scores. When target volume is this close, game script and defensive matchup typically decide the weekly winner.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Darnell Mooney sits Week 12 while Jordan Addison is off Week 6. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Darnell Mooney (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Jordan Addison (age 24) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•Jordan Addison outscored Darnell Mooney by a projected 10 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Darnell Mooney played 15 games in 2025 compared to Jordan Addison's 14. That durability gap means Darnell Mooney contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Jordan Addison scored 4 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•Jordan Addison saw 79 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Darnell Mooney vs Jordan Addison: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Darnell Mooney	Jordan Addison
PPG (Half-PPR)	7.5	8.1
Games Played	15	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	113	113
Receptions	48	42
Rec/Game	3.2	3.0
Receiving Yards	612	610
Rec Yds/Game	40.8	43.6
Receiving TDs	3	3
Targets	78	79
Target Share/Game	5.2	5.6
Age	-	24
Experience	-	2 yrs
Bye Week	Week 12	Week 6

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Jordan Addison at 8.1 PPG, 0.6 points per game above Darnell Mooney's 7.5. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Darnell Mooney vs Jordan Addison

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Darnell Mooney vs Jordan Addison

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Darnell Mooney or Jordan Addison in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Jordan Addison has the edge at 8.1 PPG compared to Darnell Mooney's 7.5 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Darnell Mooney and Jordan Addison average in 2025?▾

Darnell Mooney averaged 7.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Jordan Addison averaged 8.1 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 0.6 points per game.

When are Darnell Mooney and Jordan Addison's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Darnell Mooney (ATL) has a bye in Week 12, and Jordan Addison (MIN) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Darnell Mooney or Jordan Addison a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

Jordan Addison outscored Darnell Mooney by 0.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.