Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

De'Von Achane vs Jahmyr GibbsWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Jahmyr Gibbs is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 19.3 PPG to De'Von Achane's 18.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Jahmyr Gibbs is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Jahmyr Gibbs and De'Von Achane are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 1.2-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track De'Von Achane and Jahmyr Gibbs in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBMiami Dolphins#5

De'Von Achane

PPG

18.1

Games

Rush Yds

1,350

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

488

Bye

Week 6

RBDetroit Lions#4PPG LEADER

Jahmyr Gibbs

PPG

19.3

Games

Rush Yds

1,223

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

616

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

De'Von Achane

Jahmyr Gibbs

Head to Head

18.1 PPG19.3 PPG

16 GP17 GP

Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

De'Von Achane: Tier 1 (Elite) RB (ranked #5 at the position). Jahmyr Gibbs: Tier 1 (Elite) RB (ranked #4 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, De'Von Achane is producing at 82% of elite pace and Jahmyr Gibbs at 88%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

De'Von Achane vs Jahmyr Gibbs: The Full Breakdown

The gap between De'Von Achane and Jahmyr Gibbs is smaller than most fantasy managers think. Separated by just 1.2 PPG in 2025, this is one of those running back decisions that comes down to context, not name recognition. De'Von Achane averaged 18.1 PPG with the Miami Dolphins across 16 games, and Jahmyr Gibbs posted 19.3 with the Detroit Lions in 17.

When two running backs are separated by less than two points per game, the decision shifts to weekly context. Who has the softer defense? Who is trending up over the last month? Which team is projected for more total points? Those are the tiebreakers that actually matter.

Both are three-down backs with real passing-game roles. De'Von Achane caught 67 balls for 488 yards, and Jahmyr Gibbs hauled in 77 for 616. That receiving workload gives them high PPR floors even in games where the ground attack gets stuffed, and it is why both stay on the field in obvious passing situations.

Both share a Week 6 bye, which matters for roster construction. If you are stacking running backs this deep on your bench, plan your replacement running back early.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: De'Von Achane (age 24) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds. Jahmyr Gibbs (age 24) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds.

Did You Know?

•Jahmyr Gibbs outscored De'Von Achane by a projected 20 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Jahmyr Gibbs played 17 games in 2025 compared to De'Von Achane's 16. That durability gap means Jahmyr Gibbs contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Jahmyr Gibbs scored 18 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.1 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•Jahmyr Gibbs caught 77 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.
•Both players share a Week 6 bye. If you roster both, you will need a replacement at the position that week.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

De'Von Achane vs Jahmyr Gibbs: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	De'Von Achane	Jahmyr Gibbs
PPG (Half-PPR)	18.1	19.3
Games Played	16	17
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	290	328
Rushing Yards	1,350	1,223
Rush Yds/Game	84.4	71.9
Rushing TDs	8	13
Receptions	67	77
Receiving Yards	488	616
Targets	85	94
Total TDs	12	18
Age	24	24
Experience	2 yrs	2 yrs
Bye Week	Week 6	Week 6

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Jahmyr Gibbs at 19.3 PPG, 1.2 points per game above De'Von Achane's 18.1. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on De'Von Achane vs Jahmyr Gibbs

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on De'Von Achane vs Jahmyr Gibbs

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start De'Von Achane or Jahmyr Gibbs in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Jahmyr Gibbs has the edge at 19.3 PPG compared to De'Von Achane's 18.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did De'Von Achane and Jahmyr Gibbs average in 2025?▾

De'Von Achane averaged 18.1 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 16 games in 2025. Jahmyr Gibbs averaged 19.3 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 1.2 points per game.

Do De'Von Achane and Jahmyr Gibbs share a bye week?▾

Yes, both De'Von Achane and Jahmyr Gibbs share a Week 6 bye in 2026. If you roster both, you will need a fill-in at running back for that week.

Is De'Von Achane or Jahmyr Gibbs a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Jahmyr Gibbs outscored De'Von Achane by 1.2 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.