Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

DJ Moore vs Jordan AddisonWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

DJ Moore is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 8.7 PPG to Jordan Addison's 8.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

DJ Moore is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. DJ Moore edges Jordan Addison by 0.6 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, DJ Moore goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track DJ Moore and Jordan Addison in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRChicago Bears#41PPG LEADER

DJ Moore

PPG

8.7

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

682

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 10

WRMinnesota Vikings#49

Jordan Addison

PPG

8.1

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

610

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

DJ Moore

Jordan Addison

Head to Head

8.7 PPG8.1 PPG

17 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

DJ Moore: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #41 at the position). Jordan Addison: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #49 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, DJ Moore is producing at 40% of elite pace and Jordan Addison at 37%. That ranking gap means DJ Moore carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

DJ Moore vs Jordan Addison: The Full Breakdown

DJ Moore (8.7 PPG) and Jordan Addison (8.1 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two wide receivers are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. DJ Moore played 17 games for the Chicago Bears; Jordan Addison suited up 14 times for the Minnesota Vikings.

A 0.6-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both are workload receivers with similar target shares. DJ Moore turned 85 targets into 682 yards and 6 touchdowns, while Jordan Addison converted 79 looks into 610 yards and 3 scores. When target volume is this close, game script and defensive matchup typically decide the weekly winner.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: DJ Moore sits Week 10 while Jordan Addison is off Week 6. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: DJ Moore (age 29) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Jordan Addison (age 24) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•DJ Moore outscored Jordan Addison by a projected 10 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•DJ Moore played 17 games in 2025 compared to Jordan Addison's 14. That durability gap means DJ Moore contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•DJ Moore scored 8 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.5 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•DJ Moore saw 85 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.
•Jordan Addison is 5 years younger than DJ Moore (24 vs 29), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

DJ Moore vs Jordan Addison: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	DJ Moore	Jordan Addison
PPG (Half-PPR)	8.7	8.1
Games Played	17	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	148	113
Receptions	50	42
Rec/Game	2.9	3.0
Receiving Yards	682	610
Rec Yds/Game	40.1	43.6
Receiving TDs	6	3
Targets	85	79
Target Share/Game	5.0	5.6
Age	29	24
Experience	7 yrs	2 yrs
Bye Week	Week 10	Week 6

Summary

DJ Moore outscored Jordan Addison by 0.6 PPG in 2025 (8.7 to 8.1). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on DJ Moore vs Jordan Addison

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on DJ Moore vs Jordan Addison

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start DJ Moore or Jordan Addison in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, DJ Moore has the edge at 8.7 PPG compared to Jordan Addison's 8.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did DJ Moore and Jordan Addison average in 2025?▾

DJ Moore averaged 8.7 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Jordan Addison averaged 8.1 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 0.6 points per game.

When are DJ Moore and Jordan Addison's bye weeks in 2026?▾

DJ Moore (CHI) has a bye in Week 10, and Jordan Addison (MIN) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is DJ Moore or Jordan Addison a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

DJ Moore outscored Jordan Addison by 0.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.