Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Gus Edwards vs Jaleel McLaughlinWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Gus Edwards is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 7.0 PPG to Jaleel McLaughlin's 6.9 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Gus Edwards is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Gus Edwards edges Jaleel McLaughlin by 0.1 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Gus Edwards goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Gus Edwards and Jaleel McLaughlin in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBLos Angeles Chargers#99PPG LEADER

Gus Edwards

PPG

7.0

Games

Rush Yds

468

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

Bye

Week 5

RBDenver Broncos#99

Jaleel McLaughlin

PPG

6.9

Games

Rush Yds

382

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

168

Bye

Week 14

The Edge Chart

Gus Edwards

Jaleel McLaughlin

Head to Head

7.0 PPG6.9 PPG

13 GP15 GP

Bye: Week 5Bye: Week 14

Fantasy Tiers

Gus Edwards: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Jaleel McLaughlin: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Gus Edwards is producing at 32% of elite pace and Jaleel McLaughlin at 31%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Gus Edwards vs Jaleel McLaughlin: The Full Breakdown

Gus Edwards (7.0 PPG) and Jaleel McLaughlin (6.9 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two running backs are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. Gus Edwards played 13 games for the Los Angeles Chargers; Jaleel McLaughlin suited up 15 times for the Denver Broncos.

A 0.1-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Gus Edwards ran for 468 yards and 4 touchdowns; Jaleel McLaughlin posted 382 and 2. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Gus Edwards sits Week 5 while Jaleel McLaughlin is off Week 14. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Gus Edwards (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open. Jaleel McLaughlin (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•Gus Edwards outscored Jaleel McLaughlin by a projected 2 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Jaleel McLaughlin played 15 games in 2025 compared to Gus Edwards's 13. That durability gap means Jaleel McLaughlin contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Gus Edwards scored 4 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Gus Edwards vs Jaleel McLaughlin: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Gus Edwards	Jaleel McLaughlin
PPG (Half-PPR)	7.0	6.9
Games Played	13	15
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	91	104
Rushing Yards	468	382
Rush Yds/Game	36.0	25.5
Rushing TDs	4	2
Receptions	10	22
Receiving Yards	62	168
Targets	0	0
Total TDs	4	3
Bye Week	Week 5	Week 14

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Gus Edwards holds the PPG edge with low-end output at 7.0 points per game. Jaleel McLaughlin averaged 6.9 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Gus Edwards vs Jaleel McLaughlin

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Gus Edwards vs Jaleel McLaughlin

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Gus Edwards or Jaleel McLaughlin in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Gus Edwards has the edge at 7.0 PPG compared to Jaleel McLaughlin's 6.9 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Gus Edwards and Jaleel McLaughlin average in 2025?▾

Gus Edwards averaged 7.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Jaleel McLaughlin averaged 6.9 PPG over 15 games. That is a difference of 0.1 points per game.

When are Gus Edwards and Jaleel McLaughlin's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Gus Edwards (LAC) has a bye in Week 5, and Jaleel McLaughlin (DEN) has a bye in Week 14. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Gus Edwards or Jaleel McLaughlin a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Gus Edwards outscored Jaleel McLaughlin by 0.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.