Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Gus Edwards vs Quinshon JudkinsWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Quinshon Judkins is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 11.2 PPG to Gus Edwards's 7.0 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Quinshon Judkins is the better fantasy play this season.

Quinshon Judkins has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 4.2-PPG advantage is real (11.2 to 7.0), and Quinshon Judkins's 7 touchdowns show scoring upside. Gus Edwards is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Gus Edwards and Quinshon Judkins in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBLos Angeles Chargers#99

Gus Edwards

PPG

7.0

Games

Rush Yds

468

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

Bye

Week 5

RBCleveland Browns#23PPG LEADER

Quinshon Judkins

PPG

11.2

Games

Rush Yds

827

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

171

Bye

Week 11

The Edge Chart

Gus Edwards

Quinshon Judkins

Head to Head

7.0 PPG11.2 PPG

13 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 5Bye: Week 11

Fantasy Tiers

Gus Edwards: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Quinshon Judkins: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) RB (ranked #23 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Gus Edwards is producing at 32% of elite pace and Quinshon Judkins at 51%. That ranking gap means Quinshon Judkins carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Gus Edwards vs Quinshon Judkins: The Full Breakdown

Two running backs who will land on plenty of the same rosters in 2026. Gus Edwards (Los Angeles Chargers) finished the 2025 season averaging 7.0 fantasy points per game in 13 games. Quinshon Judkins (Cleveland Browns) came in at 11.2 PPG over 14 games. The gap is real but not insurmountable with the right matchup.

Quinshon Judkins carries a 4.2-point PPG advantage from the 2025 season. That baseline matters, but it is one input among several. Matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and injury reports move the needle week to week, which is why the best answer changes depending on when you are asking.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Gus Edwards ran for 468 yards and 4 touchdowns; Quinshon Judkins posted 827 and 7. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Gus Edwards sits Week 5 while Quinshon Judkins is off Week 11. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

If you can acquire Quinshon Judkins at a discount because your league-mates undervalue running back production, do it. Gus Edwards is a reasonable sell-high candidate if his recent games have spiked above his season average. Dynasty outlook: Gus Edwards (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open. Quinshon Judkins (age 22) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds.

Did You Know?

•Quinshon Judkins outscored Gus Edwards by a projected 71 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Quinshon Judkins played 14 games in 2025 compared to Gus Edwards's 13. That durability gap means Quinshon Judkins contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Quinshon Judkins scored 7 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.5 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Gus Edwards vs Quinshon Judkins: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Gus Edwards	Quinshon Judkins
PPG (Half-PPR)	7.0	11.2
Games Played	13	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	91	157
Rushing Yards	468	827
Rush Yds/Game	36.0	59.1
Rushing TDs	4	7
Receptions	10	26
Receiving Yards	62	171
Targets	0	36
Total TDs	4	7
Age	-	22
Bye Week	Week 5	Week 11

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Quinshon Judkins holds the PPG edge with serviceable output at 11.2 points per game. Gus Edwards averaged 7.0 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Gus Edwards vs Quinshon Judkins

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Gus Edwards vs Quinshon Judkins

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Gus Edwards or Quinshon Judkins in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Quinshon Judkins has the edge at 11.2 PPG compared to Gus Edwards's 7.0 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Gus Edwards and Quinshon Judkins average in 2025?▾

Gus Edwards averaged 7.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Quinshon Judkins averaged 11.2 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 4.2 points per game.

When are Gus Edwards and Quinshon Judkins's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Gus Edwards (LAC) has a bye in Week 5, and Quinshon Judkins (CLE) has a bye in Week 11. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Gus Edwards or Quinshon Judkins a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Quinshon Judkins outscored Gus Edwards by 4.2 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.