Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Jonathan Taylor vs Zack MossWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Jonathan Taylor is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 20.0 PPG to Zack Moss's 10.0 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Jonathan Taylor is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Jonathan Taylor outscored Zack Moss by 10.0 PPG in 2025 with 20 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Jonathan Taylor is the clear pick. Zack Moss profiles as a matchup-dependent running back who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Jonathan Taylor and Zack Moss in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBIndianapolis Colts#2PPG LEADER

Jonathan Taylor

PPG

20.0

Games

Rush Yds

1,585

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

378

Bye

Week 13

RBCincinnati Bengals#99

Zack Moss

PPG

10.0

Games

Rush Yds

685

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

148

Bye

Week 12

The Edge Chart

Jonathan Taylor

Zack Moss

Head to Head

20.0 PPG10.0 PPG

17 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 13Bye: Week 12

Fantasy Tiers

Jonathan Taylor: Tier 1 (Elite) RB (ranked #2 at the position). Zack Moss: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Jonathan Taylor is producing at 91% of elite pace and Zack Moss at 45%. That ranking gap means Jonathan Taylor carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Jonathan Taylor vs Zack Moss: The Full Breakdown

There is a real production gap between these two running backs. Jonathan Taylor (Indianapolis Colts) averaged 20.0 PPG over 17 games in 2025, outscoring Zack Moss (Cincinnati Bengals, 10.0 PPG) by 10.0 points per week. That separation would need a significant matchup swing to overcome.

The per-game difference of 10.0 points favors Jonathan Taylor, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one running back to the other.

Jonathan Taylor is the receiving back in this matchup, turning 46 targets into 378 yards, while Zack Moss profiles as a more traditional rusher with 685 rushing yards and 5 touchdowns. In PPR and half-PPR formats Jonathan Taylor carries the higher weekly floor. In standard leagues the gap tightens considerably.

One scheduling note: Jonathan Taylor is off Week 13 and Zack Moss Week 12. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in running back for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Jonathan Taylor is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Zack Moss is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Jonathan Taylor (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open. Zack Moss (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•Jonathan Taylor outscored Zack Moss by a projected 170 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Jonathan Taylor played 17 games in 2025 compared to Zack Moss's 14. That durability gap means Jonathan Taylor contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Jonathan Taylor scored 20 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•Jonathan Taylor caught 46 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Jonathan Taylor vs Zack Moss: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Jonathan Taylor	Zack Moss
PPG (Half-PPR)	20.0	10.0
Games Played	17	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	340	140
Rushing Yards	1,585	685
Rush Yds/Game	93.2	48.9
Rushing TDs	18	5
Receptions	46	20
Receiving Yards	378	148
Targets	55	0
Total TDs	20	5
Age	27	-
Experience	5 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 13	Week 12

Summary

20.0 PPG for Jonathan Taylor versus 10.0 for Zack Moss in 2025. The baseline favors Jonathan Taylor, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Jonathan Taylor vs Zack Moss

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Jonathan Taylor vs Zack Moss

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Jonathan Taylor or Zack Moss in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Jonathan Taylor has the edge at 20.0 PPG compared to Zack Moss's 10.0 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Jonathan Taylor and Zack Moss average in 2025?▾

Jonathan Taylor averaged 20.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Zack Moss averaged 10.0 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 10.0 points per game.

When are Jonathan Taylor and Zack Moss's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Jonathan Taylor (IND) has a bye in Week 13, and Zack Moss (CIN) has a bye in Week 12. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Jonathan Taylor or Zack Moss a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Jonathan Taylor outscored Zack Moss by 10.0 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.