Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Jordan Love vs Justin HerbertWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Justin Herbert is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 17.9 PPG to Jordan Love's 15.7 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Justin Herbert is the better fantasy play this season.

Justin Herbert is the better play on a neutral week. 17.9 PPG with 4,225 yards gives a reliable baseline. Jordan Love at 15.7 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Justin Herbert higher, but do not fade Jordan Love entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Jordan Love and Justin Herbert in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

QBGreen Bay Packers#21

Jordan Love

PPG

15.7

Games

Pass Yds

3,381

Pass TDs

Rush Yds

199

Bye

Week 11

QBLos Angeles Chargers#10PPG LEADER

Justin Herbert

PPG

17.9

Games

Pass Yds

3,727

Pass TDs

Rush Yds

498

Rush TDs

Bye

Week 7

The Edge Chart

Jordan Love

Justin Herbert

Head to Head

15.7 PPG17.9 PPG

15 GP16 GP

Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Jordan Love: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) QB (ranked #21 at the position). Justin Herbert: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) QB (ranked #10 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Jordan Love is producing at 71% of elite pace and Justin Herbert at 81%. That ranking gap means Justin Herbert carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Jordan Love vs Justin Herbert: The Full Breakdown

If you are choosing between Jordan Love and Justin Herbert for your lineup, you are not alone. Jordan Love finished the 2025 season at 15.7 PPG for the Green Bay Packers (15 games), and Justin Herbert averaged 17.9 for the Los Angeles Chargers (16 games).

That 2.2-point weekly advantage for Justin Herbert is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Justin Herbert offers meaningful rushing upside with 498 yards on the ground in 2025, which separates his floor from a pocket passer like Jordan Love (3381 passing yards, 23 touchdowns). In games where the passing matchup looks ugly, that rushing production can be the entire difference on a start/sit call.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Jordan Love sits Week 11 while Justin Herbert is off Week 7. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Jordan Love (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Justin Herbert (age 28) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons.

Did You Know?

•Justin Herbert outscored Jordan Love by a projected 37 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Justin Herbert played 16 games in 2025 compared to Jordan Love's 15. That durability gap means Justin Herbert contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Justin Herbert scored 28 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.8 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
•Justin Herbert added 498 rushing yards in 2025, which historically correlates with a higher fantasy floor in bad passing matchups.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Jordan Love vs Justin Herbert: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Jordan Love	Justin Herbert
PPG (Half-PPR)	15.7	17.9
Games Played	15	16
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	236	286
Passing Yards	3,381	3,727
Passing TDs	23	26
Pass Yds/Game	225.4	232.9
Rushing Yards	199	498
Rushing TDs	0	2
Total TDs	23	28
TDs/Game	1.5	1.8
Age	27	28
Experience	5 yrs	5 yrs
Bye Week	Week 11	Week 7

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Justin Herbert at 17.9 PPG, 2.2 points per game above Jordan Love's 15.7. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Jordan Love vs Justin Herbert

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Jordan Love vs Justin Herbert

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Jordan Love or Justin Herbert in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Justin Herbert has the edge at 17.9 PPG compared to Jordan Love's 15.7 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Jordan Love and Justin Herbert average in 2025?▾

Jordan Love averaged 15.7 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Justin Herbert averaged 17.9 PPG over 16 games. That is a difference of 2.2 points per game.

When are Jordan Love and Justin Herbert's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Jordan Love (GB) has a bye in Week 11, and Justin Herbert (LAC) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Jordan Love or Justin Herbert a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?▾

Justin Herbert outscored Jordan Love by 2.2 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.