Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Josh Jacobs vs Roschon JohnsonWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Josh Jacobs is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 14.6 PPG to Roschon Johnson's 8.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Josh Jacobs is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Josh Jacobs outscored Roschon Johnson by 6.5 PPG in 2025 with 14 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Josh Jacobs is the clear pick. Roschon Johnson profiles as a matchup-dependent running back who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Josh Jacobs and Roschon Johnson in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBGreen Bay Packers#8PPG LEADER

Josh Jacobs

PPG

14.6

Games

Rush Yds

929

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

282

Bye

Week 11

RBChicago Bears#99

Roschon Johnson

PPG

8.1

Games

Rush Yds

445

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

168

Bye

Week 7

The Edge Chart

Josh Jacobs

Roschon Johnson

Head to Head

14.6 PPG8.1 PPG

15 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Josh Jacobs: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) RB (ranked #8 at the position). Roschon Johnson: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Josh Jacobs is producing at 66% of elite pace and Roschon Johnson at 37%. That ranking gap means Josh Jacobs carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Josh Jacobs vs Roschon Johnson: The Full Breakdown

There is a real production gap between these two running backs. Josh Jacobs (Green Bay Packers) averaged 14.6 PPG over 15 games in 2025, outscoring Roschon Johnson (Chicago Bears, 8.1 PPG) by 6.5 points per week. That separation would need a significant matchup swing to overcome.

That 6.5-point weekly advantage for Josh Jacobs is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Josh Jacobs ran for 929 yards and 13 touchdowns; Roschon Johnson posted 445 and 4. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

One scheduling note: Josh Jacobs is off Week 11 and Roschon Johnson Week 7. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in running back for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Josh Jacobs is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Roschon Johnson is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Josh Jacobs (age 28, 6 years) is past the typical RB peak. Redraft value exceeds dynasty value. Roschon Johnson (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•Josh Jacobs outscored Roschon Johnson by a projected 111 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Josh Jacobs played 15 games in 2025 compared to Roschon Johnson's 14. That durability gap means Josh Jacobs contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Josh Jacobs scored 14 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.9 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•Josh Jacobs caught 36 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Josh Jacobs vs Roschon Johnson: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Josh Jacobs	Roschon Johnson
PPG (Half-PPR)	14.6	8.1
Games Played	15	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	219	113
Rushing Yards	929	445
Rush Yds/Game	61.9	31.8
Rushing TDs	13	4
Receptions	36	22
Receiving Yards	282	168
Targets	44	0
Total TDs	14	5
Age	28	-
Experience	6 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 11	Week 7

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Josh Jacobs at 14.6 PPG, 6.5 points per game above Roschon Johnson's 8.1. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Josh Jacobs vs Roschon Johnson

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Josh Jacobs vs Roschon Johnson

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Josh Jacobs or Roschon Johnson in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Josh Jacobs has the edge at 14.6 PPG compared to Roschon Johnson's 8.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Josh Jacobs and Roschon Johnson average in 2025?▾

Josh Jacobs averaged 14.6 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Roschon Johnson averaged 8.1 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 6.5 points per game.

When are Josh Jacobs and Roschon Johnson's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Josh Jacobs (GB) has a bye in Week 11, and Roschon Johnson (CHI) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Josh Jacobs or Roschon Johnson a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Josh Jacobs outscored Roschon Johnson by 6.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.