DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head · Start / Sit

Justin Fields vs Mac Jones

Fantasy Football Comparison for the 2026 NFL Season

QBKansas City ChiefsPPG LEADER
Justin Fields
PPG
16.0
Games
9
Pass Yds
1,259
Pass TDs
7
Rush Yds
383
Rush TDs
4
Bye
Week 6
QBSan Francisco 49ers
Mac Jones
PPG
12.4
Games
11
Pass Yds
2,151
Pass TDs
13
Bye
Week 9

Head to Head

16.0 PPG12.4 PPG
9 GP11 GP
Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 9

Justin Fields vs Mac Jones: Who Should You Start?

Two quarterbacks who will land on plenty of the same rosters in 2026. Justin Fields (Kansas City Chiefs) finished the 2025 season averaging 16.0 fantasy points per game in 9 games. Mac Jones (San Francisco 49ers) came in at 12.4 PPG over 11 games. The gap is real but not insurmountable with the right matchup.

Justin Fields carries a 3.6-point PPG advantage from the 2025 season. That baseline matters, but it is one input among several. Matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and injury reports move the needle week to week, which is why the best answer changes depending on when you are asking.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Justin Fields threw for 1259 yards and 7 touchdowns, while Mac Jones posted 2151 yards and 13 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

Justin Fields has his bye in Week 6, and Mac Jones rests in Week 9. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at quarterback for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

The Bottom Line

Based on 2025 production, Justin Fields holds the PPG edge with solid output at 16.0 points per game. Mac Jones averaged 12.4 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word — for a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Justin Fields vs Mac Jones

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Justin Fields or Mac Jones in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Justin Fields has the edge at 16.0 PPG compared to Mac Jones's 12.4 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Justin Fields and Mac Jones average in 2025?

Justin Fields averaged 16.0 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 9 games in 2025. Mac Jones averaged 12.4 PPG over 11 games. That is a difference of 3.6 points per game.

When are Justin Fields and Mac Jones's bye weeks in 2026?

Justin Fields (KC) has a bye in Week 6, and Mac Jones (SF) has a bye in Week 9. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Justin Fields or Mac Jones a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Justin Fields outscored Mac Jones by 3.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.