Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Kayshon Boutte vs Travis HunterWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Kayshon Boutte is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 7.7 PPG to Travis Hunter's 7.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Kayshon Boutte is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Kayshon Boutte and Travis Hunter are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 0.6-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Kayshon Boutte and Travis Hunter in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRNew England Patriots#53PPG LEADER

Kayshon Boutte

PPG

7.7

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

551

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 11

WRJacksonville Jaguars#58

Travis Hunter

PPG

7.1

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

298

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 7

The Edge Chart

Kayshon Boutte

Travis Hunter

Head to Head

7.7 PPG7.1 PPG

14 GP7 GP

Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Kayshon Boutte: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #53 at the position). Travis Hunter: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #58 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, Kayshon Boutte is producing at 35% of elite pace and Travis Hunter at 32%. That ranking gap means Kayshon Boutte carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Kayshon Boutte vs Travis Hunter: The Full Breakdown

Kayshon Boutte (7.7 PPG) and Travis Hunter (7.1 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two wide receivers are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. Kayshon Boutte played 14 games for the New England Patriots; Travis Hunter suited up 7 times for the Jacksonville Jaguars.

A 0.6-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both are workload receivers with similar target shares. Kayshon Boutte turned 46 targets into 551 yards and 6 touchdowns, while Travis Hunter converted 45 looks into 298 yards and 1 scores. When target volume is this close, game script and defensive matchup typically decide the weekly winner.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Kayshon Boutte sits Week 11 while Travis Hunter is off Week 7. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Kayshon Boutte (age 24) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Travis Hunter (age 23) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•Kayshon Boutte outscored Travis Hunter by a projected 10 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Kayshon Boutte played 14 games in 2025 compared to Travis Hunter's 7. That durability gap means Kayshon Boutte contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Kayshon Boutte scored 6 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.4 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•Kayshon Boutte saw 46 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Kayshon Boutte vs Travis Hunter: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Kayshon Boutte	Travis Hunter
PPG (Half-PPR)	7.7	7.1
Games Played	14	7
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	108	50
Receptions	33	28
Rec/Game	2.4	4.0
Receiving Yards	551	298
Rec Yds/Game	39.4	42.6
Receiving TDs	6	1
Targets	46	45
Target Share/Game	3.3	6.4
Age	24	23
Experience	2 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 11	Week 7

Summary

7.7 PPG for Kayshon Boutte versus 7.1 for Travis Hunter in 2025. The baseline favors Kayshon Boutte, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Kayshon Boutte vs Travis Hunter

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Kayshon Boutte vs Travis Hunter

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Kayshon Boutte or Travis Hunter in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Kayshon Boutte has the edge at 7.7 PPG compared to Travis Hunter's 7.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Kayshon Boutte and Travis Hunter average in 2025?▾

Kayshon Boutte averaged 7.7 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 14 games in 2025. Travis Hunter averaged 7.1 PPG over 7 games. That is a difference of 0.6 points per game.

When are Kayshon Boutte and Travis Hunter's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Kayshon Boutte (NE) has a bye in Week 11, and Travis Hunter (JAX) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Kayshon Boutte or Travis Hunter a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

Kayshon Boutte outscored Travis Hunter by 0.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.