DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Kimani Vidal vs Najee HarrisWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Najee Harris is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 12.8 PPG to Kimani Vidal's 9.2 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Najee Harris is the better fantasy play this season.

Najee Harris is the better play on a neutral week. 12.8 PPG with 1,235 yards gives a reliable baseline. Kimani Vidal at 9.2 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Najee Harris higher, but do not fade Kimani Vidal entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Kimani Vidal and Najee Harris in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
RBLos Angeles Chargers#32
Kimani Vidal
PPG
9.2
Games
12
Rush Yds
643
Rush TDs
3
Rec
16
Rec Yds
136
Bye
Week 7
RBPittsburgh Steelers#99PPG LEADER
Najee Harris
PPG
12.8
Games
17
Rush Yds
1,010
Rush TDs
6
Rec
30
Rec Yds
225
Bye
Week 9

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Kimani Vidal
Najee Harris

Head to Head

9.2 PPG12.8 PPG
12 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 7Bye: Week 9

Fantasy Tiers

Kimani Vidal: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB (ranked #32 at the position). Najee Harris: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Kimani Vidal is producing at 42% of elite pace and Najee Harris at 58%. That ranking gap means Kimani Vidal carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Kimani Vidal vs Najee Harris: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Kimani Vidal and Najee Harris is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The Los Angeles Chargers running back put up 9.2 PPG in 2025 over 12 games; Najee Harris of the Pittsburgh Steelers averaged 12.8 in 17. A 3.6-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 3.6 points favors Najee Harris, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one running back to the other.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Kimani Vidal ran for 643 yards and 3 touchdowns; Najee Harris posted 1010 and 6. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Kimani Vidal sits Week 7 while Najee Harris is off Week 9. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Najee Harris is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Kimani Vidal is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Kimani Vidal (age 24) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds. Najee Harris (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

  • Najee Harris outscored Kimani Vidal by a projected 61 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Najee Harris played 17 games in 2025 compared to Kimani Vidal's 12. That durability gap means Najee Harris contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Najee Harris scored 7 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.4 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Kimani Vidal vs Najee Harris: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatKimani VidalNajee Harris
PPG (Half-PPR)9.212.8
Games Played1217
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)110218
Rushing Yards6431,010
Rush Yds/Game53.659.4
Rushing TDs36
Receptions1630
Receiving Yards136225
Targets220
Total TDs47
Age24-
Experience1 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 7Week 9

Summary

12.8 PPG for Najee Harris versus 9.2 for Kimani Vidal in 2025. The baseline favors Najee Harris, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Kimani Vidal vs Najee Harris

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Kimani Vidal vs Najee Harris

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Kimani Vidal or Najee Harris in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Najee Harris has the edge at 12.8 PPG compared to Kimani Vidal's 9.2 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Kimani Vidal and Najee Harris average in 2025?

Kimani Vidal averaged 9.2 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 12 games in 2025. Najee Harris averaged 12.8 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 3.6 points per game.

When are Kimani Vidal and Najee Harris's bye weeks in 2026?

Kimani Vidal (LAC) has a bye in Week 7, and Najee Harris (PIT) has a bye in Week 9. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Kimani Vidal or Najee Harris a better fantasy running back in 2026?

Najee Harris outscored Kimani Vidal by 3.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.