DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Kyle Pitts vs Travis KelceWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Kyle Pitts is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 9.8 PPG to Travis Kelce's 9.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Kyle Pitts is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Kyle Pitts edges Travis Kelce by 0.7 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Kyle Pitts goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Kyle Pitts and Travis Kelce in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TEAtlanta Falcons#6PPG LEADER
Kyle Pitts
PPG
9.8
Games
17
Rec
88
Rec Yds
928
Rec TDs
5
Targets
118
Bye
Week 11
TEKansas City Chiefs#10
Travis Kelce
PPG
9.1
Games
17
Rec
76
Rec Yds
851
Rec TDs
5
Targets
108
Bye
Week 5

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Kyle Pitts
Travis Kelce

Head to Head

9.8 PPG9.1 PPG
17 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 5

Fantasy Tiers

Kyle Pitts: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) TE (ranked #6 at the position). Travis Kelce: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) TE (ranked #10 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Kyle Pitts is producing at 45% of elite pace and Travis Kelce at 41%. That ranking gap means Kyle Pitts carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Kyle Pitts vs Travis Kelce: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. Kyle Pitts finished the 2025 season at 9.8 PPG over 17 games with the Atlanta Falcons, while Travis Kelce clocked in at 9.1 across 17 appearances for the Kansas City Chiefs. A 0.7-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Both see steady target volume for the tight end position. Kyle Pitts had 88 catches for 928 yards; Travis Kelce posted 76 for 851. At a position where most starters barely clear 7 PPG, this class of tight end is where the fantasy advantage lives week to week.

One scheduling note: Kyle Pitts is off Week 11 and Travis Kelce Week 5. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in tight end for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Kyle Pitts (age 25) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Travis Kelce (age 36) is in the later years of production. Still a redraft asset, but dynasty value is declining.

Did You Know?

  • Kyle Pitts outscored Travis Kelce by a projected 12 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Kyle Pitts scored 5 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
  • Kyle Pitts saw 118 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.
  • Kyle Pitts is 11 years younger than Travis Kelce (25 vs 36), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Kyle Pitts vs Travis Kelce: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatKyle PittsTravis Kelce
PPG (Half-PPR)9.89.1
Games Played1717
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)167155
Receptions8876
Rec/Game5.24.5
Receiving Yards928851
Rec Yds/Game54.650.1
Receiving TDs55
Targets118108
Target Share/Game6.96.4
Age2536
Experience4 yrs12 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 11Week 5

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Kyle Pitts holds the PPG edge with low-end output at 9.8 points per game. Travis Kelce averaged 9.1 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Kyle Pitts vs Travis Kelce

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Kyle Pitts vs Travis Kelce

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Kyle Pitts or Travis Kelce in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Kyle Pitts has the edge at 9.8 PPG compared to Travis Kelce's 9.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Kyle Pitts and Travis Kelce average in 2025?

Kyle Pitts averaged 9.8 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Travis Kelce averaged 9.1 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 0.7 points per game.

When are Kyle Pitts and Travis Kelce's bye weeks in 2026?

Kyle Pitts (ATL) has a bye in Week 11, and Travis Kelce (KC) has a bye in Week 5. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Kyle Pitts or Travis Kelce a better fantasy tight end in 2026?

Kyle Pitts outscored Travis Kelce by 0.7 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.