DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Kyle Pitts vs Zach CharbonnetWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Zach Charbonnet is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 10.7 PPG to Kyle Pitts's 9.8 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Zach Charbonnet is the better fantasy play this season.

Cross-position decisions depend on league format. In half-PPR, Zach Charbonnet (10.7 PPG) is the higher-floor play. Kyle Pitts (9.8 PPG) could win a specific week on touchdown variance. For FLEX spots, lean toward the player with the softer defensive matchup that week rather than defaulting to season averages.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Kyle Pitts and Zach Charbonnet in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TEAtlanta Falcons#6
Kyle Pitts
PPG
9.8
Games
17
Rec
88
Rec Yds
928
Rec TDs
5
Targets
118
Bye
Week 11
RBSeattle Seahawks#28PPG LEADER
Zach Charbonnet
PPG
10.7
Games
16
Rush Yds
730
Rush TDs
12
Rec
20
Rec Yds
144
Bye
Week 11

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Kyle Pitts
Zach Charbonnet

Head to Head

9.8 PPG10.7 PPG
17 GP16 GP
Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 11

Fantasy Tiers

Kyle Pitts: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) TE (ranked #6 at the position). Zach Charbonnet: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB (ranked #28 at the position). Comparing across positions, raw PPG is less useful than positional scarcity. A Tier 2 (Strong Starter) TE is harder to replace on waivers than a Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB in most league formats.

Kyle Pitts vs Zach Charbonnet: The Full Breakdown

Comparing Kyle Pitts (TE, Atlanta Falcons) against Zach Charbonnet (RB, Seattle Seahawks) means weighing two different roles in your fantasy lineup. Kyle Pitts averaged 9.8 PPG in 2025 over 17 games, while Zach Charbonnet posted 10.7 PPG across 16 games.

Cross-position FLEX decisions cannot be made on PPG alone. Positional scarcity, matchup quality, floor versus ceiling, and league scoring format all shift the answer. A 14 PPG tight end in a thin TE week is often worth more than a 16 PPG receiver in a deep WR week, because the opportunity cost on the waiver wire is wildly different.

DraftCall's AI engine weighs all of these signals and returns a verdict with clear reasoning, so you are not cross-referencing four different rankings tabs on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Kyle Pitts (age 25) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Zach Charbonnet (age 25) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds.

Did You Know?

  • Zach Charbonnet outscored Kyle Pitts by a projected 15 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Kyle Pitts played 17 games in 2025 compared to Zach Charbonnet's 16. That durability gap means Kyle Pitts contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Zach Charbonnet scored 12 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.8 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
  • Kyle Pitts saw 118 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.
  • Both players share a Week 11 bye. If you roster both, you will need a replacement at the position that week.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Kyle Pitts vs Zach Charbonnet: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatKyle PittsZach Charbonnet
PPG (Half-PPR)9.810.7
Games Played1716
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)167171
Rushing Yards0730
Rush Yds/Game0.045.6
Rushing TDs012
Receptions8820
Receiving Yards928144
Targets11824
Total TDs512
Age2525
Experience4 yrs2 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 11Week 11

Summary

10.7 PPG for Zach Charbonnet versus 9.8 for Kyle Pitts in 2025. The baseline favors Zach Charbonnet, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Kyle Pitts vs Zach Charbonnet

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Kyle Pitts vs Zach Charbonnet

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Kyle Pitts or Zach Charbonnet in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Zach Charbonnet has the edge at 10.7 PPG compared to Kyle Pitts's 9.8 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Kyle Pitts and Zach Charbonnet average in 2025?

Kyle Pitts averaged 9.8 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Zach Charbonnet averaged 10.7 PPG over 16 games. That is a difference of 0.9 points per game.

Do Kyle Pitts and Zach Charbonnet share a bye week?

Yes, both Kyle Pitts and Zach Charbonnet share a Week 11 bye in 2026. If you roster both, you will need a fill-in at tight end for that week.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.