Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Ladd McConkey vs Wan'Dale RobinsonWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Wan'Dale Robinson is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 10.7 PPG to Ladd McConkey's 9.2 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Wan'Dale Robinson is the better fantasy play this season.

Wan'Dale Robinson is the better play on a neutral week. 10.7 PPG with 1,019 yards gives a reliable baseline. Ladd McConkey at 9.2 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Wan'Dale Robinson higher, but do not fade Ladd McConkey entirely.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Ladd McConkey and Wan'Dale Robinson in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

WRLos Angeles Chargers#38

Ladd McConkey

PPG

9.2

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

789

Rec TDs

Targets

106

Bye

Week 7

WRNew York Giants#23PPG LEADER

Wan'Dale Robinson

PPG

10.7

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

1,014

Rec TDs

Targets

140

Bye

Week 8

The Edge Chart

Ladd McConkey

Wan'Dale Robinson

Head to Head

9.2 PPG10.7 PPG

16 GP16 GP

Bye: Week 7Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Ladd McConkey: Tier 5 (Deep League) WR (ranked #38 at the position). Wan'Dale Robinson: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) WR (ranked #23 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, Ladd McConkey is producing at 42% of elite pace and Wan'Dale Robinson at 49%. That ranking gap means Wan'Dale Robinson carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Ladd McConkey vs Wan'Dale Robinson: The Full Breakdown

If you are choosing between Ladd McConkey and Wan'Dale Robinson for your lineup, you are not alone. Ladd McConkey finished the 2025 season at 9.2 PPG for the Los Angeles Chargers (16 games), and Wan'Dale Robinson averaged 10.7 for the New York Giants (16 games).

That 1.5-point weekly advantage for Wan'Dale Robinson is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Target volume is the story here. Wan'Dale Robinson saw 140 targets in 2025, while Ladd McConkey drew 106. That workload gap usually translates into a higher weekly floor for Wan'Dale Robinson, even in weeks where Ladd McConkey posts the bigger ceiling game. Consistency-minded managers lean toward target share; boom-bust managers chase the upside.

One scheduling note: Ladd McConkey is off Week 7 and Wan'Dale Robinson Week 8. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in wide receiver for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Ladd McConkey (age 24) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Wan'Dale Robinson (age 25) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•Wan'Dale Robinson outscored Ladd McConkey by a projected 26 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Ladd McConkey scored 6 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.4 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•Wan'Dale Robinson saw 140 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Ladd McConkey vs Wan'Dale Robinson: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Ladd McConkey	Wan'Dale Robinson
PPG (Half-PPR)	9.2	10.7
Games Played	16	16
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	147	171
Receptions	66	92
Rec/Game	4.1	5.8
Receiving Yards	789	1,014
Rec Yds/Game	49.3	63.4
Receiving TDs	6	4
Targets	106	140
Target Share/Game	6.6	8.8
Age	24	25
Experience	1 yrs	3 yrs
Bye Week	Week 7	Week 8

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Wan'Dale Robinson at 10.7 PPG, 1.5 points per game above Ladd McConkey's 9.2. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Ladd McConkey vs Wan'Dale Robinson

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Ladd McConkey vs Wan'Dale Robinson

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Ladd McConkey or Wan'Dale Robinson in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Wan'Dale Robinson has the edge at 10.7 PPG compared to Ladd McConkey's 9.2 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Ladd McConkey and Wan'Dale Robinson average in 2025?▾

Ladd McConkey averaged 9.2 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 16 games in 2025. Wan'Dale Robinson averaged 10.7 PPG over 16 games. That is a difference of 1.5 points per game.

When are Ladd McConkey and Wan'Dale Robinson's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Ladd McConkey (LAC) has a bye in Week 7, and Wan'Dale Robinson (NYG) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Ladd McConkey or Wan'Dale Robinson a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

Wan'Dale Robinson outscored Ladd McConkey by 1.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.