DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Mason Taylor vs Noah GrayWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Mason Taylor is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 5.1 PPG to Noah Gray's 4.6 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Mason Taylor is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Mason Taylor edges Noah Gray by 0.5 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Mason Taylor goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Mason Taylor and Noah Gray in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
TENew York Jets#34PPG LEADER
Mason Taylor
PPG
5.1
Games
13
Rec
44
Rec Yds
369
Rec TDs
1
Targets
65
Bye
Week 13
TEKansas City Chiefs#99
Noah Gray
PPG
4.6
Games
17
Rec
38
Rec Yds
385
Rec TDs
2
Targets
50
Bye
Week 6

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Mason Taylor
Noah Gray

Head to Head

5.1 PPG4.6 PPG
13 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 13Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Mason Taylor: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) TE (ranked #34 at the position). Noah Gray: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Mason Taylor is producing at 23% of elite pace and Noah Gray at 21%. That ranking gap means Mason Taylor carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Mason Taylor vs Noah Gray: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. Mason Taylor finished the 2025 season at 5.1 PPG over 13 games with the New York Jets, while Noah Gray clocked in at 4.6 across 17 appearances for the Kansas City Chiefs. A 0.5-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Both see steady target volume for the tight end position. Mason Taylor had 44 catches for 369 yards; Noah Gray posted 38 for 385. At a position where most starters barely clear 7 PPG, this class of tight end is where the fantasy advantage lives week to week.

One scheduling note: Mason Taylor is off Week 13 and Noah Gray Week 6. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in tight end for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Mason Taylor (age 22) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Noah Gray (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

  • Mason Taylor outscored Noah Gray by a projected 9 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Noah Gray played 17 games in 2025 compared to Mason Taylor's 13. That durability gap means Noah Gray contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Noah Gray scored 2 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.1 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
  • Mason Taylor saw 65 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Mason Taylor vs Noah Gray: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatMason TaylorNoah Gray
PPG (Half-PPR)5.14.6
Games Played1317
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)6678
Receptions4438
Rec/Game3.42.2
Receiving Yards369385
Rec Yds/Game28.422.6
Receiving TDs12
Targets6550
Target Share/Game5.02.9
Age22-
Bye WeekWeek 13Week 6

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Mason Taylor holds the PPG edge with low-end output at 5.1 points per game. Noah Gray averaged 4.6 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Mason Taylor vs Noah Gray

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Mason Taylor vs Noah Gray

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Mason Taylor or Noah Gray in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Mason Taylor has the edge at 5.1 PPG compared to Noah Gray's 4.6 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Mason Taylor and Noah Gray average in 2025?

Mason Taylor averaged 5.1 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Noah Gray averaged 4.6 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 0.5 points per game.

When are Mason Taylor and Noah Gray's bye weeks in 2026?

Mason Taylor (NYJ) has a bye in Week 13, and Noah Gray (KC) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Mason Taylor or Noah Gray a better fantasy tight end in 2026?

Mason Taylor outscored Noah Gray by 0.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.