Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Mike Gesicki vs Noah FantWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Mike Gesicki is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 4.7 PPG to Noah Fant's 4.4 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Mike Gesicki is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Mike Gesicki edges Noah Fant by 0.3 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Mike Gesicki goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

TECincinnati Bengals#36PPG LEADER

Mike Gesicki

PPG

4.7

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

307

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 6

TECincinnati Bengals#39

Noah Fant

PPG

4.4

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

288

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

Mike Gesicki

Noah Fant

Head to Head

4.7 PPG4.4 PPG

12 GP13 GP

Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Mike Gesicki: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) TE (ranked #36 at the position). Noah Fant: Tier 5 (Deep League) TE (ranked #39 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Mike Gesicki is producing at 21% of elite pace and Noah Fant at 20%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Mike Gesicki vs Noah Fant: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. Mike Gesicki finished the 2025 season at 4.7 PPG over 12 games with the Cincinnati Bengals, while Noah Fant clocked in at 4.4 across 13 appearances for the Cincinnati Bengals. A 0.3-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Both see steady target volume for the tight end position. Mike Gesicki had 28 catches for 307 yards; Noah Fant posted 34 for 288. At a position where most starters barely clear 7 PPG, this class of tight end is where the fantasy advantage lives week to week.

One thing to note: both players share a Week 6 bye. That means you need a backup plan at tight end for that week, especially if one of these two is your starter.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Mike Gesicki (age 30) is in the later years of production. Still a redraft asset, but dynasty value is declining. Noah Fant (age 28) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value.

Did You Know?

•Mike Gesicki outscored Noah Fant by a projected 5 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Noah Fant played 13 games in 2025 compared to Mike Gesicki's 12. That durability gap means Noah Fant contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Noah Fant scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
•Mike Gesicki saw 42 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.
•Both players share a Week 6 bye. If you roster both, you will need a replacement at the position that week.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Mike Gesicki vs Noah Fant: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Mike Gesicki	Noah Fant
PPG (Half-PPR)	4.7	4.4
Games Played	12	13
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	56	57
Receptions	28	34
Rec/Game	2.3	2.6
Receiving Yards	307	288
Rec Yds/Game	25.6	22.2
Receiving TDs	2	3
Targets	42	41
Target Share/Game	3.5	3.2
Age	30	28
Experience	7 yrs	6 yrs
Bye Week	Week 6	Week 6

Summary

Based on 2025 production, Mike Gesicki holds the PPG edge with low-end output at 4.7 points per game. Noah Fant averaged 4.4 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Mike Gesicki vs Noah Fant

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Mike Gesicki vs Noah Fant

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Mike Gesicki or Noah Fant in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Mike Gesicki has the edge at 4.7 PPG compared to Noah Fant's 4.4 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant average in 2025?▾

Mike Gesicki averaged 4.7 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 12 games in 2025. Noah Fant averaged 4.4 PPG over 13 games. That is a difference of 0.3 points per game.

Do Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant share a bye week?▾

Yes, both Mike Gesicki and Noah Fant share a Week 6 bye in 2026. If you roster both, you will need a fill-in at tight end for that week.

Is Mike Gesicki or Noah Fant a better fantasy tight end in 2026?▾

Mike Gesicki outscored Noah Fant by 0.3 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.