Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Rhamondre Stevenson vs Ty ChandlerWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Rhamondre Stevenson is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 11.6 PPG to Ty Chandler's 5.9 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Rhamondre Stevenson is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Rhamondre Stevenson outscored Ty Chandler by 5.7 PPG in 2025 with 9 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Rhamondre Stevenson is the clear pick. Ty Chandler profiles as a matchup-dependent running back who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Rhamondre Stevenson and Ty Chandler in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBNew England Patriots#22PPG LEADER

Rhamondre Stevenson

PPG

11.6

Games

Rush Yds

603

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

345

Bye

Week 11

RBMinnesota Vikings#99

Ty Chandler

PPG

5.9

Games

Rush Yds

265

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

135

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

Rhamondre Stevenson

Ty Chandler

Head to Head

11.6 PPG5.9 PPG

14 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Rhamondre Stevenson: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) RB (ranked #22 at the position). Ty Chandler: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Rhamondre Stevenson is producing at 53% of elite pace and Ty Chandler at 27%. That ranking gap means Rhamondre Stevenson carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Rhamondre Stevenson vs Ty Chandler: The Full Breakdown

Deciding between Rhamondre Stevenson and Ty Chandler is a common lineup dilemma for fantasy managers. The New England Patriots running back put up 11.6 PPG in 2025 over 14 games; Ty Chandler of the Minnesota Vikings averaged 5.9 in 14. A 5.7-point margin that could shift on any given week.

The per-game difference of 5.7 points favors Rhamondre Stevenson, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one running back to the other.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Rhamondre Stevenson ran for 603 yards and 7 touchdowns; Ty Chandler posted 265 and 2. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Rhamondre Stevenson has his bye in Week 11, and Ty Chandler rests in Week 6. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at running back for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Rhamondre Stevenson is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Ty Chandler is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Rhamondre Stevenson (age 28, 4 years) is past the typical RB peak. Redraft value exceeds dynasty value. Ty Chandler (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•Rhamondre Stevenson outscored Ty Chandler by a projected 97 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Rhamondre Stevenson scored 9 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.6 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•Rhamondre Stevenson caught 32 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Rhamondre Stevenson vs Ty Chandler: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Rhamondre Stevenson	Ty Chandler
PPG (Half-PPR)	11.6	5.9
Games Played	14	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	162	83
Rushing Yards	603	265
Rush Yds/Game	43.1	18.9
Rushing TDs	7	2
Receptions	32	18
Receiving Yards	345	135
Targets	37	0
Total TDs	9	3
Age	28	-
Experience	4 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 11	Week 6

Summary

11.6 PPG for Rhamondre Stevenson versus 5.9 for Ty Chandler in 2025. The baseline favors Rhamondre Stevenson, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Rhamondre Stevenson vs Ty Chandler

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Rhamondre Stevenson vs Ty Chandler

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Rhamondre Stevenson or Ty Chandler in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Rhamondre Stevenson has the edge at 11.6 PPG compared to Ty Chandler's 5.9 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Rhamondre Stevenson and Ty Chandler average in 2025?▾

Rhamondre Stevenson averaged 11.6 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 14 games in 2025. Ty Chandler averaged 5.9 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 5.7 points per game.

When are Rhamondre Stevenson and Ty Chandler's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) has a bye in Week 11, and Ty Chandler (MIN) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Rhamondre Stevenson or Ty Chandler a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Rhamondre Stevenson outscored Ty Chandler by 5.7 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.