Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Tyler Warren vs Zach ErtzWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Tyler Warren is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 8.9 PPG to Zach Ertz's 7.8 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Tyler Warren is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Tyler Warren edges Zach Ertz by 1.1 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Tyler Warren goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Tyler Warren and Zach Ertz in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

TEIndianapolis Colts#12PPG LEADER

Tyler Warren

PPG

8.9

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

817

Rec TDs

Targets

112

Bye

Week 13

TEWashington Commanders#20

Zach Ertz

PPG

7.8

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

504

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 7

The Edge Chart

Tyler Warren

Zach Ertz

Head to Head

8.9 PPG7.8 PPG

17 GP13 GP

Bye: Week 13Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

Tyler Warren: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) TE (ranked #12 at the position). Zach Ertz: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) TE (ranked #20 at the position). Among the top 30 tight ends this season, Tyler Warren is producing at 40% of elite pace and Zach Ertz at 35%. That ranking gap means Tyler Warren carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Tyler Warren vs Zach Ertz: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. Tyler Warren finished the 2025 season at 8.9 PPG over 17 games with the Indianapolis Colts, while Zach Ertz clocked in at 7.8 across 13 appearances for the Washington Commanders. A 1.1-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Tyler Warren is the volume tight end in this matchup with 76 receptions for 817 yards, while Zach Ertz profiles as a more touchdown-dependent spike play (4 scores on 50 catches). In weeks where Zach Ertz finds the end zone he out-scores Tyler Warren, but the floor gap is real.

One scheduling note: Tyler Warren is off Week 13 and Zach Ertz Week 7. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in tight end for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Tyler Warren (age 24) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset. Zach Ertz (age 35) is in the later years of production. Still a redraft asset, but dynasty value is declining.

Did You Know?

•Tyler Warren outscored Zach Ertz by a projected 19 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Tyler Warren played 17 games in 2025 compared to Zach Ertz's 13. That durability gap means Tyler Warren contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Tyler Warren scored 5 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at tight end.
•Tyler Warren saw 112 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the tight end position.
•Tyler Warren is 11 years younger than Zach Ertz (24 vs 35), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Tyler Warren vs Zach Ertz: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Tyler Warren	Zach Ertz
PPG (Half-PPR)	8.9	7.8
Games Played	17	13
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	151	101
Receptions	76	50
Rec/Game	4.5	3.8
Receiving Yards	817	504
Rec Yds/Game	48.1	38.8
Receiving TDs	4	4
Targets	112	72
Target Share/Game	6.6	5.5
Age	24	35
Experience	-	12 yrs
Bye Week	Week 13	Week 7

Summary

Tyler Warren outscored Zach Ertz by 1.1 PPG in 2025 (8.9 to 7.8). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Tyler Warren vs Zach Ertz

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Tyler Warren vs Zach Ertz

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Tyler Warren or Zach Ertz in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Tyler Warren has the edge at 8.9 PPG compared to Zach Ertz's 7.8 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Tyler Warren and Zach Ertz average in 2025?▾

Tyler Warren averaged 8.9 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Zach Ertz averaged 7.8 PPG over 13 games. That is a difference of 1.1 points per game.

When are Tyler Warren and Zach Ertz's bye weeks in 2026?▾

Tyler Warren (IND) has a bye in Week 13, and Zach Ertz (WAS) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Tyler Warren or Zach Ertz a better fantasy tight end in 2026?▾

Tyler Warren outscored Zach Ertz by 1.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.