DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Aidan O'Connell vs Geno SmithWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Aidan O'Connell is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 12.8 PPG to Geno Smith's 11.6 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Aidan O'Connell is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Aidan O'Connell edges Geno Smith by 1.2 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Aidan O'Connell goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Aidan O'Connell and Geno Smith in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
QBLas Vegas Raiders#99PPG LEADER
Aidan O'Connell
PPG
12.8
Games
13
Pass Yds
2,650
Pass TDs
16
Bye
Week 10
QBLas Vegas Raiders#34
Geno Smith
PPG
11.6
Games
15
Pass Yds
3,025
Pass TDs
19
Rush Yds
109
Bye
Week 13

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Aidan O'Connell
Geno Smith

Head to Head

12.8 PPG11.6 PPG
13 GP15 GP
Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 13

Fantasy Tiers

Aidan O'Connell: Tier 5 (Deep League) QB (ranked #99 at the position). Geno Smith: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) QB (ranked #34 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Aidan O'Connell is producing at 58% of elite pace and Geno Smith at 53%. That ranking gap means Geno Smith carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Aidan O'Connell vs Geno Smith: The Full Breakdown

Aidan O'Connell (12.8 PPG) and Geno Smith (11.6 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two quarterbacks are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. Aidan O'Connell played 13 games for the Las Vegas Raiders; Geno Smith suited up 15 times for the Las Vegas Raiders.

A 1.2-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Aidan O'Connell threw for 2650 yards and 16 touchdowns, while Geno Smith posted 3025 yards and 19 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Aidan O'Connell sits Week 10 while Geno Smith is off Week 13. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Aidan O'Connell (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Geno Smith (age 35) is on the back end of his prime. Strong now, but dynasty value declines year over year.

Did You Know?

  • Aidan O'Connell outscored Geno Smith by a projected 20 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Geno Smith played 15 games in 2025 compared to Aidan O'Connell's 13. That durability gap means Geno Smith contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Geno Smith scored 19 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.3 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Aidan O'Connell vs Geno Smith: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatAidan O'ConnellGeno Smith
PPG (Half-PPR)12.811.6
Games Played1315
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)166174
Passing Yards2,6503,025
Passing TDs1619
Pass Yds/Game203.8201.7
Rushing Yards68109
Rushing TDs00
Total TDs1619
TDs/Game1.21.3
Age-35
Experience-12 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 10Week 13

Summary

Aidan O'Connell outscored Geno Smith by 1.2 PPG in 2025 (12.8 to 11.6). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Aidan O'Connell vs Geno Smith

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Aidan O'Connell vs Geno Smith

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Aidan O'Connell or Geno Smith in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Aidan O'Connell has the edge at 12.8 PPG compared to Geno Smith's 11.6 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Aidan O'Connell and Geno Smith average in 2025?

Aidan O'Connell averaged 12.8 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Geno Smith averaged 11.6 PPG over 15 games. That is a difference of 1.2 points per game.

When are Aidan O'Connell and Geno Smith's bye weeks in 2026?

Aidan O'Connell (LV) has a bye in Week 10, and Geno Smith (LV) has a bye in Week 13. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Aidan O'Connell or Geno Smith a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Aidan O'Connell outscored Geno Smith by 1.2 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.