DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

David Montgomery vs Jacory Croskey-MerrittWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

David Montgomery is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 9.1 PPG to Jacory Croskey-Merritt's 8.0 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

David Montgomery is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, David Montgomery and Jacory Croskey-Merritt are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 1.1-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track David Montgomery and Jacory Croskey-Merritt in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
RBDetroit Lions#33PPG LEADER
David Montgomery
PPG
9.1
Games
17
Rush Yds
716
Rush TDs
8
Rec
24
Rec Yds
192
Bye
Week 6
RBWashington Commanders#40
Jacory Croskey-Merritt
PPG
8.0
Games
17
Rush Yds
805
Rush TDs
8
Rec
9
Rec Yds
68
Bye
Week 7

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
David Montgomery
Jacory Croskey-Merritt

Head to Head

9.1 PPG8.0 PPG
17 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 7

Fantasy Tiers

David Montgomery: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB (ranked #33 at the position). Jacory Croskey-Merritt: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #40 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, David Montgomery is producing at 41% of elite pace and Jacory Croskey-Merritt at 36%. That ranking gap means David Montgomery carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

David Montgomery vs Jacory Croskey-Merritt: The Full Breakdown

David Montgomery (9.1 PPG) and Jacory Croskey-Merritt (8.0 PPG) produced nearly identical fantasy numbers in 2025. When two running backs are this close on a per-game basis, the weekly matchup matters more than the season-long resume. David Montgomery played 17 games for the Detroit Lions; Jacory Croskey-Merritt suited up 17 times for the Washington Commanders.

A 1.1-point per-game gap over a full season is essentially noise. It means one extra catch, one fewer target, or a single broken play away from flipping the script. For a weekly start/sit call between these two, matchup analysis matters far more than the season line.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. David Montgomery ran for 716 yards and 8 touchdowns; Jacory Croskey-Merritt posted 805 and 8. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: David Montgomery sits Week 6 while Jacory Croskey-Merritt is off Week 7. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: David Montgomery (age 28, 6 years) is past the typical RB peak. Redraft value exceeds dynasty value. Jacory Croskey-Merritt (age 25) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds.

Did You Know?

  • David Montgomery outscored Jacory Croskey-Merritt by a projected 19 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • David Montgomery scored 9 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.5 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

David Montgomery vs Jacory Croskey-Merritt: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatDavid MontgomeryJacory Croskey-Merritt
PPG (Half-PPR)9.18.0
Games Played1717
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)155136
Rushing Yards716805
Rush Yds/Game42.147.4
Rushing TDs88
Receptions249
Receiving Yards19268
Targets2913
Total TDs98
Age2825
Experience6 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 6Week 7

Summary

9.1 PPG for David Montgomery versus 8.0 for Jacory Croskey-Merritt in 2025. The baseline favors David Montgomery, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on David Montgomery vs Jacory Croskey-Merritt

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on David Montgomery vs Jacory Croskey-Merritt

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start David Montgomery or Jacory Croskey-Merritt in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, David Montgomery has the edge at 9.1 PPG compared to Jacory Croskey-Merritt's 8.0 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did David Montgomery and Jacory Croskey-Merritt average in 2025?

David Montgomery averaged 9.1 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Jacory Croskey-Merritt averaged 8.0 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 1.1 points per game.

When are David Montgomery and Jacory Croskey-Merritt's bye weeks in 2026?

David Montgomery (DET) has a bye in Week 6, and Jacory Croskey-Merritt (WAS) has a bye in Week 7. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is David Montgomery or Jacory Croskey-Merritt a better fantasy running back in 2026?

David Montgomery outscored Jacory Croskey-Merritt by 1.1 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.