DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

David Montgomery vs RJ HarveyWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

RJ Harvey is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 10.8 PPG to David Montgomery's 9.1 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

RJ Harvey is the better fantasy play this season.

RJ Harvey has the edge, but it is not a runaway. The 1.7-PPG advantage is real (10.8 to 9.1), and RJ Harvey's 12 touchdowns show scoring upside. David Montgomery is the buy-low candidate if recent production has dipped, because the talent gap is smaller than the numbers suggest.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track David Montgomery and RJ Harvey in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
RBDetroit Lions#33
David Montgomery
PPG
9.1
Games
17
Rush Yds
716
Rush TDs
8
Rec
24
Rec Yds
192
Bye
Week 6
RBDenver Broncos#27PPG LEADER
RJ Harvey
PPG
10.8
Games
17
Rush Yds
540
Rush TDs
7
Rec
47
Rec Yds
356
Bye
Week 10

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
David Montgomery
RJ Harvey

Head to Head

9.1 PPG10.8 PPG
17 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 10

Fantasy Tiers

David Montgomery: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB (ranked #33 at the position). RJ Harvey: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) RB (ranked #27 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, David Montgomery is producing at 41% of elite pace and RJ Harvey at 49%. That ranking gap means RJ Harvey carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

David Montgomery vs RJ Harvey: The Full Breakdown

Two running backs who will land on plenty of the same rosters in 2026. David Montgomery (Detroit Lions) finished the 2025 season averaging 9.1 fantasy points per game in 17 games. RJ Harvey (Denver Broncos) came in at 10.8 PPG over 17 games. The gap is real but not insurmountable with the right matchup.

RJ Harvey carries a 1.7-point PPG advantage from the 2025 season. That baseline matters, but it is one input among several. Matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and injury reports move the needle week to week, which is why the best answer changes depending on when you are asking.

RJ Harvey is the receiving back in this matchup, turning 47 targets into 356 yards, while David Montgomery profiles as a more traditional rusher with 716 rushing yards and 8 touchdowns. In PPR and half-PPR formats RJ Harvey carries the higher weekly floor. In standard leagues the gap tightens considerably.

David Montgomery has his bye in Week 6, and RJ Harvey rests in Week 10. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at running back for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: David Montgomery (age 28, 6 years) is past the typical RB peak. Redraft value exceeds dynasty value. RJ Harvey (age 25) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds.

Did You Know?

  • RJ Harvey outscored David Montgomery by a projected 29 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • RJ Harvey scored 12 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.7 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
  • RJ Harvey caught 47 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

David Montgomery vs RJ Harvey: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatDavid MontgomeryRJ Harvey
PPG (Half-PPR)9.110.8
Games Played1717
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)155184
Rushing Yards716540
Rush Yds/Game42.131.8
Rushing TDs87
Receptions2447
Receiving Yards192356
Targets2958
Total TDs912
Age2825
Experience6 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 6Week 10

Summary

Based on 2025 production, RJ Harvey holds the PPG edge with serviceable output at 10.8 points per game. David Montgomery averaged 9.1 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on David Montgomery vs RJ Harvey

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on David Montgomery vs RJ Harvey

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start David Montgomery or RJ Harvey in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, RJ Harvey has the edge at 10.8 PPG compared to David Montgomery's 9.1 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did David Montgomery and RJ Harvey average in 2025?

David Montgomery averaged 9.1 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. RJ Harvey averaged 10.8 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 1.7 points per game.

When are David Montgomery and RJ Harvey's bye weeks in 2026?

David Montgomery (DET) has a bye in Week 6, and RJ Harvey (DEN) has a bye in Week 10. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is David Montgomery or RJ Harvey a better fantasy running back in 2026?

RJ Harvey outscored David Montgomery by 1.7 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.