Head to Head

Updated June 3, 2026 from live stats

Jahmyr Gibbs vs Ty ChandlerWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Jahmyr Gibbs is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 19.3 PPG to Ty Chandler's 5.9 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Jahmyr Gibbs is the better fantasy play this season.

Jahmyr Gibbs is clearly the better fantasy option heading into 2026. With 19.3 PPG and 1,839 total yards in 2025, the production separation is too wide to overcome on matchup alone. Ty Chandler (5.9 PPG) is a hold, not a sell, but roster Jahmyr Gibbs as the starter and Ty Chandler as depth.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Jahmyr Gibbs and Ty Chandler in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App

RBDetroit Lions#4PPG LEADER

Jahmyr Gibbs

PPG

19.3

Games

Rush Yds

1,223

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

616

Bye

Week 6

RBMinnesota Vikings#99

Ty Chandler

PPG

5.9

Games

Rush Yds

265

Rush TDs

Rec

Rec Yds

135

Bye

Week 6

The Edge Chart

Jahmyr Gibbs

Ty Chandler

Head to Head

19.3 PPG5.9 PPG

17 GP14 GP

Bye: Week 6Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Jahmyr Gibbs: Tier 1 (Elite) RB (ranked #4 at the position). Ty Chandler: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Jahmyr Gibbs is producing at 88% of elite pace and Ty Chandler at 27%. That ranking gap means Jahmyr Gibbs carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Jahmyr Gibbs vs Ty Chandler: The Full Breakdown

The numbers tell a clear story here. Jahmyr Gibbs put up 19.3 fantasy points per game for the Detroit Lions in 2025, while Ty Chandler managed 5.9 across 14 games with the Minnesota Vikings. A 13.4-point weekly edge is substantial at the running back position.

A 13.4-PPG gap gives Jahmyr Gibbs the edge on paper, but paper does not account for Thursday night matchups, weather games, or a star defender returning from injury. The real question is not who was better in 2025, but who is the better start this specific week.

Jahmyr Gibbs is the receiving back in this matchup, turning 77 targets into 616 yards, while Ty Chandler profiles as a more traditional rusher with 265 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. In PPR and half-PPR formats Jahmyr Gibbs carries the higher weekly floor. In standard leagues the gap tightens considerably.

One thing to note: both players share a Week 6 bye. That means you need a backup plan at running back for that week, especially if one of these two is your starter.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

If you can acquire Jahmyr Gibbs at a discount because your league-mates undervalue running back production, do it. Ty Chandler is a reasonable sell-high candidate if his recent games have spiked above his season average. Dynasty outlook: Jahmyr Gibbs (age 24) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds. Ty Chandler (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

•Jahmyr Gibbs outscored Ty Chandler by a projected 228 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•Jahmyr Gibbs played 17 games in 2025 compared to Ty Chandler's 14. That durability gap means Jahmyr Gibbs contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•Jahmyr Gibbs scored 18 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.1 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
•Jahmyr Gibbs caught 77 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.
•Both players share a Week 6 bye. If you roster both, you will need a replacement at the position that week.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Jahmyr Gibbs vs Ty Chandler: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	Jahmyr Gibbs	Ty Chandler
PPG (Half-PPR)	19.3	5.9
Games Played	17	14
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	328	83
Rushing Yards	1,223	265
Rush Yds/Game	71.9	18.9
Rushing TDs	13	2
Receptions	77	18
Receiving Yards	616	135
Targets	94	0
Total TDs	18	3
Age	24	-
Experience	2 yrs	-
Bye Week	Week 6	Week 6

Summary

Jahmyr Gibbs outscored Ty Chandler by 13.4 PPG in 2025 (19.3 to 5.9). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Jahmyr Gibbs vs Ty Chandler

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Jahmyr Gibbs vs Ty Chandler

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Jahmyr Gibbs or Ty Chandler in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, Jahmyr Gibbs has the edge at 19.3 PPG compared to Ty Chandler's 5.9 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Jahmyr Gibbs and Ty Chandler average in 2025?▾

Jahmyr Gibbs averaged 19.3 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Ty Chandler averaged 5.9 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 13.4 points per game.

Do Jahmyr Gibbs and Ty Chandler share a bye week?▾

Yes, both Jahmyr Gibbs and Ty Chandler share a Week 6 bye in 2026. If you roster both, you will need a fill-in at running back for that week.

Is Jahmyr Gibbs or Ty Chandler a better fantasy running back in 2026?▾

Jahmyr Gibbs outscored Ty Chandler by 13.4 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.