DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Jake Browning vs Mac JonesWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Mac Jones is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 11.8 PPG to Jake Browning's 11.3 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Mac Jones is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Mac Jones and Jake Browning are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 0.5-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Jake Browning and Mac Jones in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
QBTampa Bay Buccaneers#99
Jake Browning
PPG
11.3
Games
5
Pass Yds
771
Pass TDs
6
Rush TDs
1
Bye
Week 11
QBSan Francisco 49ers#33PPG LEADER
Mac Jones
PPG
11.8
Games
11
Pass Yds
2,151
Pass TDs
13
Bye
Week 8

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Jake Browning
Mac Jones

Head to Head

11.3 PPG11.8 PPG
5 GP11 GP
Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Jake Browning: Tier 5 (Deep League) QB (ranked #99 at the position). Mac Jones: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) QB (ranked #33 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Jake Browning is producing at 51% of elite pace and Mac Jones at 54%. That ranking gap means Mac Jones carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Jake Browning vs Mac Jones: The Full Breakdown

The gap between Jake Browning and Mac Jones is smaller than most fantasy managers think. Separated by just 0.5 PPG in 2025, this is one of those quarterback decisions that comes down to context, not name recognition. Jake Browning averaged 11.3 PPG with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers across 5 games, and Mac Jones posted 11.8 with the San Francisco 49ers in 11.

When two quarterbacks are separated by less than two points per game, the decision shifts to weekly context. Who has the softer defense? Who is trending up over the last month? Which team is projected for more total points? Those are the tiebreakers that actually matter.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Jake Browning threw for 771 yards and 6 touchdowns, while Mac Jones posted 2151 yards and 13 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

Jake Browning has his bye in Week 11, and Mac Jones rests in Week 8. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at quarterback for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Jake Browning (age 30) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Mac Jones (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons.

Did You Know?

  • Mac Jones outscored Jake Browning by a projected 9 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Mac Jones played 11 games in 2025 compared to Jake Browning's 5. That durability gap means Mac Jones contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Mac Jones scored 13 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Jake Browning vs Mac Jones: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatJake BrowningMac Jones
PPG (Half-PPR)11.311.8
Games Played511
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)57130
Passing Yards7712,151
Passing TDs613
Pass Yds/Game154.2195.5
Rushing Yards3960
Rushing TDs10
Total TDs713
TDs/Game1.41.2
Age3027
Experience7 yrs4 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 11Week 8

Summary

11.8 PPG for Mac Jones versus 11.3 for Jake Browning in 2025. The baseline favors Mac Jones, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Jake Browning vs Mac Jones

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Jake Browning vs Mac Jones

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Jake Browning or Mac Jones in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Mac Jones has the edge at 11.8 PPG compared to Jake Browning's 11.3 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Jake Browning and Mac Jones average in 2025?

Jake Browning averaged 11.3 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 5 games in 2025. Mac Jones averaged 11.8 PPG over 11 games. That is a difference of 0.5 points per game.

When are Jake Browning and Mac Jones's bye weeks in 2026?

Jake Browning (TB) has a bye in Week 11, and Mac Jones (SF) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Jake Browning or Mac Jones a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Mac Jones outscored Jake Browning by 0.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.