DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Bo Nix vs Daniel JonesWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Bo Nix is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 17.9 PPG to Daniel Jones's 17.4 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Bo Nix is the better fantasy play this season.

This one is genuinely close. Bo Nix edges Daniel Jones by 0.5 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, Bo Nix goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Bo Nix and Daniel Jones in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
QBDenver Broncos#11PPG LEADER
Bo Nix
PPG
17.9
Games
17
Pass Yds
3,931
Pass TDs
25
Rush Yds
356
Rush TDs
5
Bye
Week 10
QBIndianapolis Colts#13
Daniel Jones
PPG
17.4
Games
13
Pass Yds
3,101
Pass TDs
19
Rush Yds
164
Rush TDs
5
Bye
Week 13

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Bo Nix
Daniel Jones

Head to Head

17.9 PPG17.4 PPG
17 GP13 GP
Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 13

Fantasy Tiers

Bo Nix: Tier 2 (Strong Starter) QB (ranked #11 at the position). Daniel Jones: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) QB (ranked #13 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Bo Nix is producing at 81% of elite pace and Daniel Jones at 79%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Bo Nix vs Daniel Jones: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. Bo Nix finished the 2025 season at 17.9 PPG over 17 games with the Denver Broncos, while Daniel Jones clocked in at 17.4 across 13 appearances for the Indianapolis Colts. A 0.5-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Bo Nix threw for 3931 yards and 25 touchdowns, while Daniel Jones posted 3101 yards and 19 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

One scheduling note: Bo Nix is off Week 10 and Daniel Jones Week 13. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in quarterback for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Bo Nix (age 26) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Daniel Jones (age 29) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons.

Did You Know?

  • Bo Nix outscored Daniel Jones by a projected 9 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Bo Nix played 17 games in 2025 compared to Daniel Jones's 13. That durability gap means Bo Nix contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Bo Nix scored 30 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.8 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
  • Bo Nix added 356 rushing yards in 2025, which historically correlates with a higher fantasy floor in bad passing matchups.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Bo Nix vs Daniel Jones: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatBo NixDaniel Jones
PPG (Half-PPR)17.917.4
Games Played1713
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)304226
Passing Yards3,9313,101
Passing TDs2519
Pass Yds/Game231.2238.5
Rushing Yards356164
Rushing TDs55
Total TDs3024
TDs/Game1.81.8
Age2629
Experience1 yrs6 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 10Week 13

Summary

Bo Nix outscored Daniel Jones by 0.5 PPG in 2025 (17.9 to 17.4). That production gap is the baseline, but weekly context shifts the answer. DraftCall analyzes matchup difficulty, scoring trends, and health data to deliver a clear start or sit recommendation backed by real reasoning.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Bo Nix vs Daniel Jones

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Bo Nix vs Daniel Jones

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Bo Nix or Daniel Jones in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Bo Nix has the edge at 17.9 PPG compared to Daniel Jones's 17.4 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Bo Nix and Daniel Jones average in 2025?

Bo Nix averaged 17.9 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 17 games in 2025. Daniel Jones averaged 17.4 PPG over 13 games. That is a difference of 0.5 points per game.

When are Bo Nix and Daniel Jones's bye weeks in 2026?

Bo Nix (DEN) has a bye in Week 10, and Daniel Jones (IND) has a bye in Week 13. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Bo Nix or Daniel Jones a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Bo Nix outscored Daniel Jones by 0.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.